Well can you objectively state what is right or wrong? After all killing is prevalent in nature and nobody cares if the lion eats the lamb.

Animals kill other Animals for food, we do the same. Killing for sport is wrong. Also I cant think of any animals that kill their own for food. Killing is a part of survival, when it becomes a part of sport or entertainment than it is wrong.

At this point you need to spell your position out in good old fashioned propositional logic. You know, if P then Q, and if not P then not Q. That sort of stuff. I'm not the only one that is confused over what your position is here. Why not just find out what behavioral patterns are more productive, and then teach them directly? Why are Gods needed for morality? What makes the existance of Gods necessary for the existance of Objective Morality? 

Are you kidding me? Horus would weigh the hearts of the dead against a feather of truth. If their sins were greater than the weight of the feather they'd be fed to a crocodile/hippo monster. Euthypro's dilemma asks whether moral laws are something prescribed by the gods, or whether they are something followed and enforced by the gods. Just about EVERY pagan religion on the planet has had a system of ethics. 

Do yourself a favor and read up on Egyptian moral law. It's called Maat. http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/ethics.htm

I didn't read your post because it was to long, and my American attention span is to short to read it fully, however I personally do not care if god exists. If he does, I would not worship him. If he attempts to smites me down, than I will conquer him with my superior knowledge and strength.

There are vegetarians who would call eating meat an evil act. Where is your morality now?

"Why not just find out what behavioral patterns are more productive, and then teach them directly?"

several reasons - for one as i've said most of these concepts are very complex and, therefore, have to be encoded into stories to convey the meanings in a more effective way

also have you ever disobeyed good advice that was conveyed to you? i'm guessing that's the case since everyone does, however, you'd be more compelled to follow certain advice if that advice transcends your subjective view of the world or is assigned to something that transcends your subjective view of the world

and that's all a god is in this context - something that transends the limited subjective scope humans are plagued with

that's why in the past there were gods for many of the intangible concepts we deal with that appear to be constants such aphrodite for love and ares for war 

yes intelligence fosters moral behavior to some extent since inidividuals come to understand that if they work together they can achieve much more than they can alone

however, with that also comes the capacity for sociopathic destructive behavior, its not just a positive attribute with regards to morality

In that case I didn't misunderstand anything. Your position is literally that ethics can't be taught without attributing them to a god in a story. 

Well I think mandatory worshiping some god whatever this concept is defined, its a dope concept but cant help out against some people stuborness. If they leave me be so I will.Amen.lol