You do realize Sony has marketing rights to Battlefront 2, so you won't hear about Scorpio's resolution?

Also this:

" Internal Scorpio developer documentation we've seen describes how well Microsoft's console manages to run the most basic of ports of key Xbox One titles. The names of the games aren't specifically mentioned, but one example stands out - it's described as a 60fps first-person shooter that has shipped using the DX12 API, running on a proprietary engine and rendering at 720p resolution. By a process of elimination, this sounds like Star Wars Battlefront - a Frostbite title - and the data is fascinating. Based on GPU performance alone - CPU isn't included in the data - the unoptimised Scorpio port running at the same resolution could hit 120 frames per second. But at native 4K, it's only 36-40fps. "

Worth pointing out that Battlefront 2 is bigger, more demanding than last one.

Expect 1440p very high or maybe ultra details.

That would be still 4x the resolution + higher details, which sounds much more likely than 4K.

Nobody is saying it isn't impressive, but it's still far below 60 and Battlefront is 60 fps title.

I don't think optimization can help reach 24 more frames on average.

Don't expect GTX 1080 or GTX 1080 Ti Performance.

Yes, of course I watch them all except Bethesda which is at 6 AM my time.

Hory Shet, I just realised he's created 731 threads, but he only has 3493 posts.

1 in 6 of his posts are from creating new threads.

Once I hear what I have to say there is really nothing else to discuss.