Bullshit. I remember that survey they sent out ages back that people could vote in and this option here.

- A Far Cry game in the present day, set in a Jurassic Park Style island of dinosaurs

Got the most votes by a vast margin. What's the point even doing a survey if they're going to just ignore the top choice that people wanted?

More spaghetti western games the merrier.

People are forgetting that despite RDR2 coming out, it's not remotely been hinted or announced for PC, so if anything, Ubisoft's game can appeal to those wanting their spaghetti western fix there.

I can see the headlines now: This is a Far Cry from Red Dead Redemption 2.

As long as they don't reelase it in a buggy state, slice up content and charge for an expensive season pass and slap Denuvo on top, then I can imagine it doing well on PC. 

Considering that they never sold the original RDR on PC and they just recently killed a total conversion mod that aimed at bringing RDR to PC, I'd say the FC spaghetti western game is all there is to roll with. They should totally release it after RDR2 like you said, as well as spending the time needed to make sure it runs smoothly at launch.

farcry 4 actually had a smooth launch, little to no bugs and ran well. same with Farcry Primal. and they didnt cut out content and charge for an expensive season pass. the DLC was very much an extension to the game, rather than a main part of it. and the game had a lot of worthwhile content to justify its price. 

Let's hope Ubisoft keep it that way from here on in.

Well... i got Far cry primal recently for dirty cheap. The setting interested me. I heard good things about Farcry 3 from a friend, but i still haven't played so i don't have a good grasp on the series yet.

But, doing a western next to Redemption 2 seems to be suicide. If it is, they really have to release it before redemption 2 or just keep it in the backburner for another year.

They have my cat.

Not my fault. I was busy playing non-western Ubisoft games.

Wrong