Nautilus said:
VideoGameAccountant said:
The difference was Hyrule Warriors is a good idea. Zelda characters beat up waves of enemies. Fun. A turn based RPG (that was co-op for some reason) with Mario characters fighting Rabbids, characters no one likes anymore. Doesn't sound fun. A big reason I didn't believe this (and still don't until someone can produce more than "my Uncle Works for Ubisoft") is that no one likes this idea. I figure some executive would have figured this out before greenlighting the game.
|
Nah, the only bad idea there is the Rabbids part, since its a very random carachter that has nothing to do with Mario(not to mention that is not iconic).Its a great idea to have a turn based battle.I mean, just look at Super Mario RPG!Better yet, it baffles me even more as to why Nintendo didnt go to Square to make this RPG and make a different collaboration with Ubisoft in something they are more confortable with.
|
Well, that's part of it yeah. Nothing about this idea seems like it meshes together. Mario RPGs are fun, but the crossover is supposed to be a turn-based RPG? And there is co-op? And there are laser guns I guess. Heck, most of this stuff doesn't appear in Rabbids games. Yeah, part of the gimmick of Rabbids is there go to places, world, time and do stupid Rabbids things. Not sure why it would be an RPG with laser guns. Heck, I'm surprised Ubisoft didn't try to do a wreck-it Ralph thing where the Rabbids go to different video games. It would fit their motif better.
One of the reasons I said it was fake way back in January is it sounds like it was made by a dumb fan rather than a development team or a publisher. Everything seems off. And again, no one likes this idea.