So you mean to forbid a person to, for example, say that he/she is a nazi (but the person can still think it)? So basically a totalitarian society that acts as if, as lo g as people don't say what they think, everything is fine? That is how you breed ignorance in every society. The best thing is if people express their opinion, no matter how we think of them, and then we get a chance to oppose them. That way we practice critical thinking and rationality. Forbidding opinion is how Christianity for hundreds of years kept the rational discussion out of society...

What I'm saying that if doesn't say that he's a Nazi, we can't do anything about because we wouldn't know that he's a Nazi. It'd be fine and dandy if we could let Nazis say their views and just get on with our day with nothing happening, but as we saw with World War II, letting Nazis grow and fester doesn't turn out well.

What? That makes absolutely no sense. You clearly are opposing something you do not understand. People who make billions need to invest their money into something, and that something creates jobs and jobs create wealth. What the billionares own, are shares that have an imaginary value that's based on how they are respected on the market. You can't save money because inflation eats away the billionaires savings.

Equal distribution of wealth have no value by itself, as everyone can be piss-poor. What better welfare needs, is investments from people who have money to invest. Going a decade back, the main driver of global economy was investments that were made to China. In similar fashion there should be some driver (that has money to invest) in global economics to have GNP growing again.

What's causing today's financial problems is (loan) money that's leaving the market faster than there's new (loan) money coming on the market and inflation eating away the value of old debt.

Some food for thought: let's say a square meter in an appartment in Helsinki would be worth the same as square kilometer of desert in Africa, which would be more valuable, the the square meter or square kilometer? In the current financial atmosphere they'd be worth the same, but clearly how the real value should be calculated is much more complex than just to compare the monetary value.

And seeing what happened in Soviet Union, letting communists grow and fester doesn't turn out well. And Yugoslavia. And Cuba. And Spain. And...

But looking at WW2 and western capitalism, UK, USA, W. Germany, it's pretty clear which system have been the best.

The difference is that communism is a benevolent ideology that was hijacked by authoritarian dictators. Nazism is bad at its core.

Competition is vital in all aspects of life. If you see someone that has it better, it drives you to better yourself and strive to obtain it. That drive or instinct should be encouraged in all people because they'll never get ahead without it. 

This is why I don't like socialism and communism because it punishes people who try to better themselves for the so called good of all people. If you destroy the point of "trying" to get ahead by taking anything of worth and giving it to people who are in need because of their apathy, it will only create more apathetic people. It's a society that will destroy itself in the long run because it disregards human nature and reality. It's the ultimate form of envy, self-loathing and misanthropy. No matter what is done, there will always be people who do good and people who don't. There will be always be the rich and poor. Making everyone poor or miserable for the sake of equality is not a way to obtain equality or fairness. 

I'm all for helping out people who are in actual need because hard times or because of their empairment to work. 

People are not born It's incredible niave to believe that you can get rid of "there'll always be people that lose out"

We're already destroying ourselves with competition. There are numerous people starving while so much food is wasted, and we're destroying our environment beyond repair.

There will be more starving people without competition and the drive to better themselves because of people becoming more apathetic living under communism or socialism.  

Apathy? After what you wrote in the thread about civilians getting killed?

Really? But doesn't communism begin with oppression? What would make national socialism any worse than that?