By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Zelda BOTW has the most perfect scores on Metacritic.

It means nothing. Today there are much more websites reviewing games compared to a few years ago. So of course it has more scores. It is an unfair comparison. In my opinion Metacritic should add median scores. They provide a much better comparison compared to average scores.



Around the Network
etking said:

It means nothing. Today there are much more websites reviewing games compared to a few years ago. So of course it has more scores. It is an unfair comparison. In my opinion Metacritic should add median scores. They provide a much better comparison compared to average scores.

You just shot yourself in the foot. Zelda has less unique reviews compared to many of the games at the top (except for a few like OoT). So i guess LoZ is in the disadvantage yet it prevailed to the top.

 



etking said:

It means nothing. Today there are much more websites reviewing games compared to a few years ago. So of course it has more scores. It is an unfair comparison. In my opinion Metacritic should add median scores. They provide a much better comparison compared to average scores.

That's not true, GTAIV from 2008. has 86 review scores, Zelda BotW currently has 76.



Zelda is a brand new game. It will have more reviews than GTAIV in a few years.



etking said:
Zelda is a brand new game. It will have more reviews than GTAIV in a few years.

You don't know, almost all reviews are coming in 1st weeks after launch, not in years after launch.



Around the Network
etking said:
Zelda is a brand new game. It will have more reviews than GTAIV in a few years.

"Today there are much more websites reviewing games compared to a few years ago. So of course it has more scores."

 

Yet it has less as of right now with way more perfect scores. How are you still able to spin this?

 



onionberry said:
Robert_Downey_Jr. said:
weapon degradation should make any game ineligible for a perfect score. Same with a lives system (not in Zelda just saying). Useless features to add artificial playtime due to to to'ing and fro'ing

With the variation of weapons and how easy is to find new weapons, I don't see the problem. Plus adds more challenge, at least that's how I see it. I prefer this sytem now because all of the awesome weapons on this games.

I agree and disagree. I broke my a becaue i accidently threw it lol. Now I need to find another to chop wood down. Mind you i just played about an hour exploring the first region.



 

 

Cobretti2 said:
onionberry said:

With the variation of weapons and how easy is to find new weapons, I don't see the problem. Plus adds more challenge, at least that's how I see it. I prefer this sytem now because all of the awesome weapons on this games.

I agree and disagree. I broke my a becaue i accidently threw it lol. Now I need to find another to chop wood down. Mind you i just played about an hour exploring the first region.

Live and learn, sounds like.  Not a design flaw.



"You should be banned. Youre clearly flaming the president and even his brother who you know nothing about. Dont be such a partisan hack"

IkePoR said:
Cobretti2 said:

I agree and disagree. I broke my a becaue i accidently threw it lol. Now I need to find another to chop wood down. Mind you i just played about an hour exploring the first region.

Live and learn, sounds like.  Not a design flaw.

well not a design flaw, just sucks because if thats the only axe in he game fmd.



 

 

Cobretti2 said:
IkePoR said:

Live and learn, sounds like.  Not a design flaw.

well not a design flaw, just sucks because if thats the only axe in he game fmd.

Its all about survival, this game gives you a whole bunch of "deal with it".

 

Ex i have to carry a fire sword just to keep warm in an area and cant fight since i will freeze to death if it breaks lol