StarDoor said:
Don't get your hopes up. This patent was filed on August 6, 2015, and we first heard about the NX on March 17, 2015. Nintendo was still first. |
We didn't know what the NX was back then.
StarDoor said:
Don't get your hopes up. This patent was filed on August 6, 2015, and we first heard about the NX on March 17, 2015. Nintendo was still first. |
We didn't know what the NX was back then.
Lawlight said: We didn't know what the NX was back then. |
But Nintendo did, and that's what matters.
pray4mojo said:
Sony's handhelds have only outperformed Nintendos in the specs department. That hasn't translated to sales as Nintendos handhelds have never been challenged, even in Japan. Sony isn't going to capture the Japanese martket no matter what. Right now, in light of Switch being a hybrid, Sony can only try to stay afloat. Home consoles are dead. Ninendo handhelds reign supreme. There's really no where for them to go right now and it's going to be interesting to see how they approach the problem. |
Just to be clear, you're speaking Japanese sales only, right?
I need to know that's the extent you're speaking here, because it could be interpreted in a different way.
They do not need to outsell Nintendo's handheld in Japan to make money, there's obviously the western market that will also buy the product. It's possible to take a piece of the pie, there's no need to let Nintendo have a monopoly on handheld gaming.
Also as I mentioned before. If you're thinking Nintendo can sell a highly limited handheld for over $300 and be successful, history says otherwise.
setsunatenshi said:
Just to be clear, you're speaking Japanese sales only, right?
I need to know that's the extent you're speaking here, because it could be interpreted in a different way.
They do not need to outsell Nintendo's handheld in Japan to make money, there's obviously the western market that will also buy the product. It's possible to take a piece of the pie, there's no need to let Nintendo have a monopoly on handheld gaming.
Also as I mentioned before. If you're thinking Nintendo can sell a highly limited handheld for over $300 and be successful, history says otherwise. |
Yeah. It's an entirely different world outside of Japan lol.
Kai_Mao said:
If Nintendo Switch's price is what it is with the power it has, I can imagine Sony's take would be more expensive since I'm sure those ARM chips that can handle PS4-like power could be very pricey alone. Plus add in component to keep the console cool and functioning with that kind of power...it adds up. |
Doubt it. My guess is they would aim for the same price, maybe even $199-$249. How you might ask. Well, simple. By actually playing this smart.
For one, you don't use obscure Nvidia chips that are barely in anything. You use top of the line mobile chips that are used in many phones, which drives down the price. Sony has also shown it is much better at negotiating prices on their parts. Nintendo had to sell the Wii U at a loss when the thing used incredibly outdated tech and launched at ~$349. Compare that to the $399 PS4 that didn't take very long for Sony to become profitable on each console sold, yet used much better/newer tech. Nintendo also can not drop the price to $199-$249, which should have happened a year or more ago, otherwise they start losing money on it, again, while Sony, at the worst, is breaking even at $249.
Sony would also most likely sell the dock separate, though the device would probably be able to connect to the tv without it. It also wouldn't be as much as Nintendo is asking for a new one, probably $50 max. I'd imagine they wouldn't include motion controls in the controllers, instead relying on them inside the device, which tablet gamers are used to. And, finally, they would just use the improved rumble found in the DS4, not HD rumble, which requires more motors.
Having said that, I doubt Sony is going to do this. I think they are done with the handheld market until it can prove it is no longer dying.
Ah yes.. That's the Sony I know and love..
"We hold these truths to be self-evident - all men and women created by the, go-you know.. you know the thing!" - Joe Biden
Well, my view on it is that trademarks shoud be useless unless the products are already actively in production. I know Sony is especially guilty of making countless trademarks that never actually materialise.
StarDoor said:
But Nintendo did, and that's what matters. |
But we don't know whether they did back then.
Oh my goodness, I'm so glad Sony didn't do it, that's one ugly mother fucker, that shit is not Sony worthy.
Soundwave said: If Sony really wanted to fuck Nintendo they could release this for tablets. |
There are already controllers like that though, and it's not like sony would really release big games on tablets, it would be way too easy to pirate and performances would be dog shit across different configurations of hardware, you wouldn't see any nice looking games like on their actual hardware. Really though, the main part is too easy to pirate. Even if they just make a tablet, it'd not be less than 600 dollars because it's Sony.