By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Mafia Round 77 - Low-Power?? Hate the Mod!!

hatmoza said:
Stefl1504 said:

That is pretty much the explanation why I think that casting indefferent/ez votes is not great. In a game were your votes cannot be un-cast it is better to obtain an image of the situation first. Rashly putting out the 3 no lynch votes gave me a good image of you, but it is so much a no tell to me it hurts me.

A distributed vote for me would be one vote on 3 different people. While a shared one would be 1-2. Then there is a preventative votes which is basically put the remaining votes on no lynch.

If I have to vote on too little ground, I would at least put one of my votes on no lynch to counterbalance it, eventually, this wouldn't get me far, but would also prevent scum from vote-rush a person, which right now is one of the most dangerous things there can be this game.

1 scum theoretically can already win against 3 people just by putting out his votes in a really nice timing.

Yes, one can have serious votes on day one.

Right now I am thinking of putting out a trucks-sword-ff distributed vote. Trucks, show us you're town, I know you can do it ;P

I could prevent any lynch that I personally deem stupid, where lack of evidence occurs, it was just some random lynch-train occuring by people carelessly stacking votes, shit like that.

That's a good attitude to have for future days. And I generally agree but I'm asking specifically about today. I understand why future vote distribution in coming days will be inportant. You did not answer my question. Instead you used future day scenarios to answer a question about day 1. That's something prof would refer to as "meta", no?

I'll ask again. What is an alternative to a no lynch TODAY?

Right at this moment? Nothing

Upcoming day 1 - maybe something.



Around the Network

Still not satisfied with you stefl. you continue to blend your answer with future scenarios and I don't like your indirectness one bit.

FF was very direct with what he had to say. His reactions are giving me a town read. You on the other hand are wording what you say carefully as if you want a way of what you say in the future. I still stand by my no lynch day 1 but I have strong scum read on you.



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

hatmoza said:
Still not satisfied with you stefl. you continue to blend your answer with future scenarios and I don't like your indirectness one bit.

FF was very direct with what he had to say. His reactions are giving me a town read. You on the other hand are wording what you say carefully as if you want a way of what you say in the future. I still stand by my no lynch day 1 but I have strong scum read on you.

You directly asked me about what the alternative today is. I stated as such. I am not going to change my answer just to suit you in this regard.



Stefl1504 said:
hatmoza said:
Still not satisfied with you stefl. you continue to blend your answer with future scenarios and I don't like your indirectness one bit.

FF was very direct with what he had to say. His reactions are giving me a town read. You on the other hand are wording what you say carefully as if you want a way of what you say in the future. I still stand by my no lynch day 1 but I have strong scum read on you.

You directly asked me about what the alternative today is. I stated as such. I am not going to change my answer just to suit you in this regard.

To directly recall it: trucks-sword-ff distributed vote or no-lynch stack



padib said:
So, since nothing is happening so far, has anyone noticed the blatant slip or is it just me? Trucks, Noctis, Clyde?

Are you asking those 3 because they are involved or because you want them to point it out?



Around the Network
Stefl1504 said:
padib said:
So, since nothing is happening so far, has anyone noticed the blatant slip or is it just me? Trucks, Noctis, Clyde?

Are you asking those 3 because they are involved or because you want them to point it out?

Probably the latter. I'll have to go through the posts again to see. I admittedly haven't really been that attentive this game so I'll need to get on that.



Also just noticed that Sword is currently banned.



I will be honest I still cannot see any reads in here.



Stefl1504 said:
hatmoza said:
Still not satisfied with you stefl. you continue to blend your answer with future scenarios and I don't like your indirectness one bit.

FF was very direct with what he had to say. His reactions are giving me a town read. You on the other hand are wording what you say carefully as if you want a way of what you say in the future. I still stand by my no lynch day 1 but I have strong scum read on you.

You directly asked me about what the alternative today is. I stated as such. I am not going to change my answer just to suit you in this regard.

Just because I'm not satisfied with your answers does not mean I'm waiting for a suitable response. I said you are giving open answers and that bothers you... Interesting how you twisted that displeasure as a failed attempt to suit me. Like I said, it comes off as if you want don't want to be precise, in case you need to back track.

Now I'm wondering why I'm easily getting under your skin.



I am the black sheep     "of course I'm crazy, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong."-Robert Anton Wilson

BladeSymphony said:
I don't think anything sufficient will be found day one.

**Vote: No lynch**

But we can continue to talk yes? and we can go from there?

Who are you suspects at the moment?