That's very incorrect. And dangerously uninformed.
He has already appointed people to his cabinet. Saying that we can't make assessments about that, when there have been congressional hearings for them for that very purpose, is like saying you can't judge me for putting a todler at the wheel of a bus until the bus has already crashed.
There have been many many concerns raised about many of his appointments lacking qualification, experience or even basic understanding of the departments they're put in charge of. What they have in common is donating millions to his campaign, and to the republican party.



Several of his apppointments completely contradicts his campaign promise of "draining the swamp" of lobbyists, and his strong message of him funding his own campaign so that he won't become corrupted by bribes, pretending to carry a similar message to Bernie Sanders, except what he witheld from voters who don't fact check (and that's probably the majority) is that this only meant paying for a portion of it. He still took millions in bribes and has since invited those people who are now cashing in their favors with him into his administration. Exactly what he claimed he wouldn't do.

We can't judge him for appointing someone from Goldman Sachs as treasure secretary, when he during his campaign slammed Hillary for dealing with them? After Trump said they are the worst bankers in Americawho "robbed the middle class"? Yes we can. And that's not an intended Obama pun.
Where's the special procecutor he was going to assign to investigate Hillary Day 1? Well he now says "I don't want to hurt them (the Clintons). They are good people." But during his campaign, he got people fired up at this prospect and they chanted "Lock her up!"
And there's a lot more to discuss about his campaign promises already.

So please don't tell us who stay informed about these things that we can't judge him yet. It grinds my gears because that is one reason he got elected.
His decisions already began before he was sworn in. Most of it will come from here on out, yes. But there are already actions he is held accountable for.

"Can't claim anything" =/= damage.

We can certainly claim that him saying he would drain the swamp of lobbyists, and then inviting lobbyists into his administration after they donated millions to him, is very deceptive. Among many other things.

We'll get to actual damage when it becomes relevant.

Innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

Counting people around the world vs in a city...

These protests are useless anyway and will be forgotten by next week.

They should have called it an anti Trump march than a womens march. I saw more anti trump posters than things concerning womens rights like planned parenthood. Saw some pro Muslim posters as well.

Also Bush jr had lots of protestors https://youtu.be/eNf0sv1Hmlo

The last Republican president was heavily protested as well, so yes. Seems normal to me. Lefties like to make a big do out of everything. Tbh, I expected more for a guy who is LITERALLY HITLER (WE MEAN IT THIS TIME).

you said hillary should run for mayor in london. I tried to get you to explain that joke. you know what, just forget it.

Because your picture was comparing the DC metro to the London one...