By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Would you buy a "Switch TV"?

Tagged games:

 

Switch or Switch TV?

I like to go portable, sometimes. 29 42.65%
 
I just want to stay home. 31 45.59%
 
Nothing Nintendo does will please me. Ever. 8 11.76%
 
Total:68

No, i would not!



Around the Network
RolStoppable said:
d21lewis said:

PSTV?

When you remove the controller too.

PS Vita was $250 and $300 at launch (yikes!).

The home version was $100. You could buy that and a PS4 controller ($60) and still not pay full Vita price.

 

Unless I'm missing something, Nintendo could do the same. I'm of the "full experience" camp, though. I want the option of portability and $300 is a fair price, IMO.



Nope! The switch part just fits me with uni!



Pocky Lover Boy! 

A Switch that would be only the dock with the console's hardware inside and a Pro controller instead of the joycons for $200 230 €... yes, please.



Please excuse my bad English.

Former gaming PC: i5-4670k@stock (for now), 16Gb RAM 1600 MHz and a GTX 1070

Current gaming PC: R5-7600, 32GB RAM 6000MT/s (CL30) and a RX 9060XT 16GB

Steam / Live / NNID : jonxiquet    Add me if you want, but I'm a single player gamer.

Nope. I love portable consoles! I even bought a Vita - twice!



唯一無二のRolStoppableに認められた、VGCの任天堂ファミリーの正式メンバーです。光栄に思います。

Around the Network

No, I'd already have a Switch lol



RolStoppable said:
d21lewis said:

PS Vita was $250 and $300 at launch (yikes!).

The home version was $100. You could buy that and a PS4 controller ($60) and still not pay full Vita price.

 

Unless I'm missing something, Nintendo could do the same. I'm of the "full experience" camp, though. I want the option of portability and $300 is a fair price, IMO.

By the time the Vita TV launched, the Vita was already down to $200. The savings weren't significant.

Lot of variables. I mean, what if you already had a PS3 or PS4? You could just use what you already had. And if Nintendo went this route, who says they had to do it now? They could wait a year.

 

To be honest, I don't even know what I'm defending. I guess, that there's a possibility and all of those "It costs too much" or "I don't want a portable" people could finally shut up.

 

Then again, the Vita (with its abysmal fist party support) wasn't a success. Maybe a non portable Switch would just follow suit.



I would absolutely consider it. I only game at home.



Yes, but it would be to supplement my actual Switch.



One just as weak as the Switch? No. One as powerful as competing home consoles? Sure.