By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - How Bloodborne would look like in 60FPS

Jizz_Beard_thePirate on 16 December 2016

I so want a pro patch for it T-T



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

Around the Network
Azuren on 16 December 2016
Slimebeast said:

Damn, I need to play this game. That atmosphere of sorrow was fantastic.

It gets very Lovecraftian after (I think) the fourth mandatory boss.

 

EDIT: Yep, double checked. It's the fourth mandatory boss. Depending on how you play the game, though, it could be your fifth  sixth, or even seventh boss. 



Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:

www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames

Slimebeast on 16 December 2016
Azuren said:
Slimebeast said:

Damn, I need to play this game. That atmosphere of sorrow was fantastic.

It gets very Lovecraftian after (I think) the fourth mandatory boss.

 

EDIT: Yep, double checked. It's the fourth mandatory boss. Depending on how you play the game, though, it could be your fifth  sixth, or even seventh boss. 

Nice! Have you completed the game?



OttoniBastos on 16 December 2016

.

Last edited by OttoniBastos - on 02 July 2018

patronmacabre on 16 December 2016

Unpopular opinion (and I have a high-end gaming PC, so don't say I am a blind console peasant): Souls is better in 30 fps.
The combat has weight to it. Putting it in 60 fps makes it too responsive and it feels wrong. I feel like I get an extra iframe with my dodge rolls.

Now, a pro-patch to fix the frame pacing issues would be awesome.



Around the Network
miz1q2w3e on 16 December 2016

At first I was thinking "there isn't much difference", although usually I can spot 60 vs 30 fps.

Turns out this is just bullshit by the channel; they use motion interpolation. True 60 fps would look much smoother.



Frogger on 16 December 2016
FIT_Gamer said:
OdinHades said:
I don't know, 30 fps is fine by me. Sure, 60 fps is a little more fluid, but I doubt I would notice that all that much while playing the game. There are games which profit heavily from 60 fps. Bloodborne is not one of them. But maybe that's just me.

Yep it's just you.

Seconded. "A little more fluid?" Come on.



Ruler on 16 December 2016
miz1q2w3e said:
At first I was thinking "there isn't much difference", although usually I can spot 60 vs 30 fps.

Turns out this is just bullshit by the channel; they use motion interpolation. True 60 fps would look much smoother.

It looks a lot better even with with edited motion interpolation tough . Sony should rather find a way using this motion interpolation technique for gaming in 60fps, rather than Checkerboard 4K, or both. 



Why i left PC gaming

 

(2015) Question for PS4 owners: if the situation would be reverse? would you still play on PS4?

(2015) The "I don't care PS4 is the most powerful console" thread

rolltide101x on 16 December 2016

Frame rate just does not make a very large difference in a 3rd person game. That is why almost all 3rd person games are locked at 30 FPS



Azuren on 16 December 2016
Slimebeast said:
Azuren said:

It gets very Lovecraftian after (I think) the fourth mandatory boss.

 

EDIT: Yep, double checked. It's the fourth mandatory boss. Depending on how you play the game, though, it could be your fifth  sixth, or even seventh boss. 

Nice! Have you completed the game?

Completed it? I Platinum'd it!



Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:

www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames