gcwy said:
Nautilus said:
What?Of course it is all about quality.It dosent matter if you get 50 games on launch.If those 50 games are bad, it will be the same as releasing none.Quantity dosent mean it will have a successful launch, but the number of worthwhile games to play is.And again, that list is not final.Far from it actually.So knowing this, the Switch line up of the first year, and so far launch too, seems really solid and much better than the Wii and the Wii U.And to be quite honest, much better than the PS4 and XOne.
|
That's a really subjective matter, which I said previously. By your logic, Switch still has the weakest launch lineup of any console in history because I won't be looking forward to any of those games except Mario. See how opinions work? You seem to be stating your own opinion and then making it seem like a fact.
|
Well if you look at it that way, sure.But everything can be an opinion.If the water tastes good, if dancing is good, if chocolate tastes good.When I state things as "facts", I am saying that is what the mojority of people agrees on.Otherwise, you cant have an discussion, because everything would end in "well, thats just an opinion, so its not valid".And I mean, I think that most people agree that the Wii and Wii U launch lineup well, sucked for the most part.And if the Mario Game is like Mario 64, coupled with a hopefully decent RPG from Ubisoft and Splatoon, and aclaimed Wii U game, I think that most people can agree that is a very solid launch, or at the very least that is better than the previous two generations.
