By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Image & Form Says Nintendo Isn’t “Skimping On Power” With Nintendo Switch!

curl-6 on 08 November 2016
Miyamotoo said:
curl-6 said:

You're talking about what you expect. But you don't speak for everyone.

And you're still using unproven specs as if they are confirmed. A quad core ARM A57 CPU is not proven. 3GB of RAM for games is not proven. Stop talking as though they are.

Its not just my expectation, that similars expectation of plenty of people who are actually aware about very posible Switch hardware.

Nothing is proven expect that Nvidia is doing chip (but Nivida did said "NVIDIA GPU based on the same architecture as the world’s top-performing GeForce gaming graphics cards") we talk about what we can expect and most likely scenario with infos we have, same like we talk what we can expect and what's most likely scenario for Switch concept.

Of course we can talk about it, I'm just saying that you tend to word things in such a way that implies your opinions are confirmed facts.



Around the Network
Miyamotoo on 08 November 2016
Akeos said:
I'm not understand your logic .... How you want portages with 500 or 600 Gflops ... We can not have the 1080p with so little ... Nintendo seems yet to come gamers (classic pad, e-sport) ... Why try to entice the gamer on one side if it is to still provide a machine that will not be upgraded...
It's like trying to race on one leg ... After the slap they took with the WiiU, Nintendo can not ignore the power ... It is giving the stick to be beaten ... . If the machine has 2 or 3 times the power of the Nintendo WiiU ... would have had every interest in saying that the switch is a portable ... not a home console...

Wii U with 176 Gflops have Smash Bros 4 and Zelda WW HD running at 1080p for instance, with 500-600 Gflop more power they would be able running majority of their games at 1080p.



Miyamotoo on 08 November 2016
curl-6 said:
Miyamotoo said:

Its not just my expectation, that similars expectation of plenty of people who are actually aware about very posible Switch hardware.

Nothing is proven expect that Nvidia is doing chip (but Nivida did said "NVIDIA GPU based on the same architecture as the world’s top-performing GeForce gaming graphics cards") we talk about what we can expect and most likely scenario with infos we have, same like we talk what we can expect and what's most likely scenario for Switch concept.

Of course we can talk about it, I'm just saying that you tend to word things in such a way that implies your opinions are confirmed facts.

I didn't said and of course that are not facts (only fact is Nintendo custom cheap), I wrote what can be expected with infos we having and around specific power.



curl-6 on 08 November 2016
Miyamotoo said:
curl-6 said:

Of course we can talk about it, I'm just saying that you tend to word things in such a way that implies your opinions are confirmed facts.

I didn't said and of course that are not facts (only fact is Nintendo custom cheap), I wrote what can be expected with infos we having and around specific power.

But you didn't say "can be expected", you said "it's expected", which implies a general consensus which I don't see adequate evidence of.



Miyamotoo on 08 November 2016
curl-6 said:
Miyamotoo said:

I didn't said and of course that are not facts (only fact is Nintendo custom cheap), I wrote what can be expected with infos we having and around specific power.

But you didn't say "can be expected", you said "it's expected", which implies a general consensus which I don't see adequate evidence of.

Yes, it's expected something like that, so people can expect something like that. I relly dont see whats exatly problem!?



Around the Network
curl-6 on 08 November 2016
Miyamotoo said:
curl-6 said:

But you didn't say "can be expected", you said "it's expected", which implies a general consensus which I don't see adequate evidence of.

Yes, it's expected something like that, so people can expect something like that. I relly dont see what exatly problem!?

It's a matter of semantics really; I don't mean this as an attack on you so please don't be offended, but is English your first language? Because if it isn't, then I would understand that semantic technicalities can be very challenging.

Also, just for the record, comparing FLOPS between a mobile nvidia GPU and a console AMD GPU is a pretty useless comparison. It's like comparing CPUs from two different architectures on clock speed alone.



Miyamotoo on 08 November 2016
curl-6 said:
Miyamotoo said:

Yes, it's expected something like that, so people can expect something like that. I relly dont see what exatly problem!?

It's a matter of semantics really; I don't mean this as an attack on you so please don't be offended, but is English your first language? Because if it isn't, then I would understand that semantic technicalities can be very challenging.

Also, just for the record, comparing FLOPS between a mobile nvidia GPU and a console AMD GPU is a pretty useless comparison. It's like comparing CPUs from two different architectures on clock speed alone.

English isn't my first language, so definitely I can make mistakes with some "semantic technicalities".

Of Course, but that's actually goes in favour of Nvidia and in this case in favour of Switch.



Akeos on 08 November 2016
Miyamotoo said:
Akeos said:
I'm not understand your logic .... How you want portages with 500 or 600 Gflops ... We can not have the 1080p with so little ... Nintendo seems yet to come gamers (classic pad, e-sport) ... Why try to entice the gamer on one side if it is to still provide a machine that will not be upgraded...
It's like trying to race on one leg ... After the slap they took with the WiiU, Nintendo can not ignore the power ... It is giving the stick to be beaten ... . If the machine has 2 or 3 times the power of the Nintendo WiiU ... would have had every interest in saying that the switch is a portable ... not a home console...

Wii U with 176 Gflops have Smash Bros 4 and Zelda WW HD running at 1080p for instance, with 500-600 Gflop more power they would be able running majority of their games at 1080p.

 

You're right,  but if we speak about port,  it's an other thing...  Come with 500/700 GFLOPS is like say "we don't care about editors want"  



Miyamotoo on 08 November 2016
Akeos said:
Miyamotoo said:

Wii U with 176 Gflops have Smash Bros 4 and Zelda WW HD running at 1080p for instance, with 500-600 Gflop more power they would be able running majority of their games at 1080p.

 

You're right,  but if we speak about port,  it's an other thing...  Come with 500/700 GFLOPS is like say "we don't care about editors want"  

 

If we talk about 3rd party ports of course, I expecting 540-720p in handheld mode and 720p in docked mode for 3rd party ports (of course less demandning games like Lego, Just Dance...would be able to run at higher resolution).



Akeos on 08 November 2016
Miyamotoo said:
Akeos said:

 

You're right,  but if we speak about port,  it's an other thing...  Come with 500/700 GFLOPS is like say "we don't care about editors want"  

 

If we talk about 3rd party ports of course, I expecting 540-720p in handheld mode and 720p in docked mode for 3rd party ports (of course less demandning games like Lego, Just Dance...would be able to run at higher resolution).

In that case, why make a trailer for gamers ... Shyrim, classic or pro pad, select nvidia instead of DMP, no children ... And what Nintendo will do if microsoft or sony them also come with a portable 1 TFLOPS with ease porting their games xbox / ps4... 

And in what Switch is a new concept ? It's just a portable  with TV mode... Why trying to do believe that a home console ? Something is going wrong...