vizunary said:
Your a DUMBASS, sorry this had to be pointed out. 1st you are using bias figures that try to say that PS3 sales don't count as blu ray sales and that's BS, in fact i wouldn't mind a poll on here of PS3 owners that have at least 1 BD and probably more. I would guess the only ones who don't probably do not have an HDTV, so it wouldn't make sense to invest in BDs yet. They were actually MANY movie buffs, as you put it, that held out on getting a Blu-ray player because the first generation hardware generally sucks and they knew they could get a PS3 cheaper than any other player. As for your second stupid comment, learn how the this tecnology works or expect to get reamed by someone that does. A 51 GB HD-DVD is going to be just as expensive to produce as a dual layer BD, plus there are octal, that's eight, layer BD that, number 1, works on my machine, and number 2, is already made, just not needed or affordable to produce. Plus the new tri-layer HDDVD discs from Toshiba WILL NOT play in todays HDDVD players, so you are in point in fact royally F#CKED if toshiba gets their way and this disc becomes the standard by which all HD DVD will be made. quote from reghardware "The snag, of course, is that today's HD DVD players will be incapable of reading the new disc, which is something of a problem for early adopters, who will presumably have to buy new kit. Toshiba last week positioned the new disc as an "extended capacity, high-end option". ® Don't worry, I'm sure these new players will be at half the price of a BD player ;) |
I said actual players DUMBASS the PS3 is a videogame machine with a bluray drive in it. And if you count the PS3 as a bluray player than you have like 15 bluray players to 1 hddvd player. Why do they only have 55% of the market share and why does the bluray technology have alot more technical problems with the players and the movies yet you still favor it over hddvd when it's more reliable, cheaper, and the same quality.