@ bolded

How many politicians do you think are equally incompetent and have also compromised national security but just haven't been caught (at least in public)? I suspect there's a scary number of politicians who are equally as incompetent in that regard. 

Great contribution to the conversation.   THe world needs uninformed followers too i expect  but we already have too many-  That is why we are in this position in the first place.

sorry but I'd take a semi-sketchy-health Hilary over Donald Trump any day of the week. realize that Presidential candidates have teams behind them, its not as if she'd be operating 100% with no help. and worse case scenario someone will step up if she were to die in office, the VP. its just what happens

for the record I think Clinton is a bit of a bought and paid for name however Donald Trump is egotistical, racist, cannot relate to the average person at all, and dangerous in terms of international policy.

He won't win the election and things like constantly discussing Hilary's health are just desperate ploys to try and give him a chance. Sorry but the average American doesn't trust a racist billionaire to do the job. Maybe either candidate would be poor choices, but at least Hilary doesn't spout out with racist comments every 5 minutes

Fine, deny all the evidence you want but the emails are there just to show how the Clinton Foundation donors colluded with the Secretary of State at that time ... 

Okay, you're done. Hillary Clinton is awful and you're just awful at proving it, especially when it's just simply too easy. 

Hillary Clinton compromised national security. She lied on numerous occasions about it. Then got caught. When she was caught, she claimed not ignorance, but incompetence. The person that many want to be our nation's most powerful figure is so mind-blowingly awful at what she does that she couldn't even pay attention for a 15 minute briefing on how classified information is labeled.

So now we're stuck with two potential characters in Hillary; the one that she wants us to believe is an incompetent fool unfit to run a country, and the one that might be hosting become that facade whole planning who knows what. 

Full disclosure, I don't want Trump to be president. I did at one point early in the race, but he's become increasingly hostile towards people that he doesn't need to be hostile towards. He's opened his mouth and awful, awful things have come out. But you know what? 

We know what kind of person he is. He's not a wildcard, he's just a bad one. 

Hillary, on the other hand, is a card equally bad (but in a different way)... Unless she's actually a maniac. So I just don't care to sit by and listen to people compare her and Trump, only to act like one is better. They're two different flavors of shit; diarrhea and green diarrhea. Stop acting like your political party chose the less shit candidate, because it didn't. 

Infowars is basically a tabloid site which frequently posts false information and this article posts absolutely nothing in the way of sources. Got any sources that are even mildly trustworthy?

The worst thing that I have seen any solid proof of from this whole debacle is Clinton maybe meeting with donors, and that has already been deemed to be entirely legal.

http://www.newsweek.com/john-dean-why-pay-play-charges-against-clinton-are-bogus-496742

LOL, Infowars the site that is run by right wing conspricacy nut and snake oil salesman Alex Jones my asshole is a more creditable source of information than that garbage site.

Similarly to the "Elvis is still alive man" crowd, some ideas simply do not warrant a response other than ridicule and disdain. I do not care if your delicate sensibilities are harmed by my succinct and direct reply.