By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - I want to know your opinion between a PS4 Pro and Xbox Scorpio battle

 

So...

Xbox Scorpio 164 33.68%
 
PS4 Pro 213 43.74%
 
None. I'm cool with my console. 72 14.78%
 
See results 38 7.80%
 
Total:487
Azuren said:
spemanig said:
The XBOS feels like a Pro + a Slim + a 4K blu-ray drive for $300.

I don't see where the comparison is at all. MS won this on by a mile. It doesn't matter that Scorpio is out next year. XBOS is out now and essentially already does what the Pro does for $100 less. Scorpio will come out next year and do more. Pro isn't even remotely powerful enough to make a marketable difference over the XBOS, let alone the PS4/Slim.

If you have a 4K TV, HDR, and are looking for a new console this holiday, I don't see why anyone would pick a PS4 product over the XBOS. It's cheaper, smaller, plays games in "4K," uses HDR, plus it plays 4K Blu-Rays which neither SP products do.

Also, stop talking about PC like it's a factor in console affairs. When it comes to consoles, PC doesn't matter. There's no "if you want a premium console, you'll just get a PC." If you want a premium console, you'd have gotten a PS4 because PC is irrelevant to console gamers. Scorpio will appeal to a huge audience of people who want a powerful console but don't want the inconveniences of PC, and that's more than enough to sell it.

Except it doesn't actually play games in higher resolutions.

Fixed.



Around the Network
spemanig said:
Azuren said:

Except it doesn't actually play games in higher resolutions and has no exclusives.

4K and yes it does.

Upscale =/= 4K or we wouldn't be so worried about a 4K drive in the first place, and no, it doesn't.



Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:

www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames

Raistline said:
Captain_Yuri said:

Yea but none of them really say that the image quailty is bad or anything. Infact, most of them say that the image quailty is stunning... So idk where you got that from? Yea they say its the cheapest but they don't say that the image quality is bad or anything...

From your first link's review:

"The console shows off the advantages of 4K: remarkable clarity, minute details and lifelike textures. I could make out the consistency of the motor oil Charlize Theron smears across her face as war paint.

You also get a noticeably higher dynamic range. It isn't just about fierce bright areas and inky blacks: the fine increments between are subtly drawn too, and you get plenty of shadow detail. You also get the wider colour gamut that HDR promises. There's a part in Mad Max: Fury Road where somebody gets shot with a flare gun. When the reddish-orange smoke explodes, it's hard not to marvel.

From your second link:

"On the Xbox One S you get the full Ultra HD and HDR experience. The visuals from those top-spec TVs are stunning. Sure the top spec Panasonic UHD Blu-ray player might just edge things out in terms of absolute picture quality, but as so much is governed by the performance of the TV it's attached to, we think most will find themselves entranced by the richness and detail that Ultra HD Blu-ray offers from the Xbox One S."

And the third one just says its a great value and doesn't really say anything about the quality. Yea they are saying that the Panasonic one is better but it only "Edges" out which isn't exactly saying that the X1 Slim is bad...

The TVs that I have looked at, the Samsung one seems to review one of the highest. So which TV do you suggest I get?

Sorry about the late reply btw, I was driving T_T

I could not find the artcile I read that did a point-point comparison of the 3 major 4K Blu-Ray players out there so I used a few form google that directed towards my point. The difference in picture quality may have been exaggerated a bit by me due to past experiences between Blu-Ray and DVD players when comparing the Console verisons to stand-alones. Even with that said though, the differences seen are based strictly on how good you display is.

I have 2 suggestions for TV's for each type, LCD side and one OLED.

$2.5K Curved OLED: https://www.amazon.com/LG-Electronics-OLED55B6P-55-Inch-Ultra/dp/B01CDF9S1G/

$2.3K Flat OLED: https://www.amazon.com/LG-Electronics-55EF9500-55-Inch-Ultra/dp/B010RWWQF2

$1.3K LCD: https://www.vizio.com/tvs/pseries/p55c1.html

$1.6K LCD:  https://www.amazon.com/dp/B01A5LUBJS/ref=twister_B01ASYSN42?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1

 

Here is a link to a great site that has impartial reviews and grading on many different aspects of a display: http://www.rtings.com/tv/tests/picture-quality

Be wary of the User Ratings that come up on this site though, they are very colored to the users.

 

Edit: I am a huge fan of Samung TV's and their HD TV's are some of the best around but I am dissapointed with their recent 4K/UHD offerings. 

Hmm I am not a fan of Vizio. But I do love Oled screens. Its one of the reasons why I buy Galaxy S devices over and over again. Grrrrr tempting. Thanks for the suggestions!



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

Azuren said:

Upscale =/= 4K or we wouldn't be so worried about a 4K drive in the first place, and no, it doesn't.

Upscale =/= 4K for any of the consoles revealed this year. For the common consumer, the upscale is doing enough, and yes it does.



spemanig said:
Azuren said:

Upscale =/= 4K or we wouldn't be so worried about a 4K drive in the first place, and no, it doesn't.

Upscale =/= 4K for any of the consoles revealed this year. For the common consumer, the upscale is doing enough, and yes it does.

Except I never said 4K, I said higher resolutions (which PS4P does support). Upscaling from a higher resolution yields better results.



Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:

www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames

Around the Network
gatito said:
No sane person with a 4K TV would buy a PS4 now. Sony really screwed up.

No sane person with a 1080p tv would buy a 360 either, right? And streaming wasn't even widely adopted yet.


Anyway I would be interested in a downscaling 4K UHD player. My projector can display 4:4:4 full RGB at 1080p. UHD discs contain 4:2:0 4K video, meaning 1920x1080 color resolution.  (blu-ray has 960x540 color resolution) I bet a downconversion to 4:4:4 1080p with one of the already longer available wider color spaces than the standard rec.709 of blu-ray would make a calibrated 1080p tv look stunning, 4 x the color resolution of blu-ray. So far most 4K UHD discs are made by upscaling 4:4:4 2K masters anyway. The ps3 already supported deep color and x.v. color, ps4 probably too.

Why does 4K look better on 1080p monitors:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kIf9h2Gkm_U

But no, the tv industry wants you to buy a new tv while never having used 1080p tv to its full capabilities. And just like 1080p 4K tvs will never see 4:4:4 video content besides store demo loops.

Actually it seems the Samsung UBD-K8500 can downscale to 1080p, albeit to 4:2:0, still seems to have better results. (higher bbandwidth source, chroma subsampling after decompression instead of before lossy compression)
https://tapatalk.com/topic/2337057-47413
If the XBox One S can play UHD discs on HDMI 1.4 1080p tvs as well, that would be another nudge for me to buy one.



LMU Uncle Alfred said:
Depends if a professional can fight off a scorpion.../bad pun

I laughed because I'm stupíd.



3DS, Wii, PSP, Vita, PS2, PS3, PS4 & Steam.

Well I play on PC, so all of this is somewhat irrelevant to me.
I might pick up a console eventually (first I need a TV...), but if I do it'll be a PS4. I'd rather even a regular PS4 over an Xbox Scorpio. Everything I've heard from people who own both is that their Xbox One buggers them around a lot more than their PS4. Plus signing on to one's Playstation feels marginally less like joining some sort of cult than signing on to one's Xbox. At least in this current generation.

Neither of these upgrades really impresses me. A 4k TV can already upscale for me. Now natively rendering in 4k, THAT would impress me, but it wouldn't change the fact that I don't have a TV... and if and when I get one, I doubt I'll be able to splurge on 4k.



The argument is being made to early for these two systems. PS4 Pro is real and physical it has concrete specs. The Xbox Scorpio has not even shown a design concept yet, and only a CG rendering of a portion of its Mobo which is causing speculation on the amount of ram or GPU the only number MS gave was that it would have 6tf's.

I think people are more disappointed with Sony's handling of the PS4 Pro and marketing angle more than anything. With PSVR they had it out there set up demo stations, revealed it talked about everything except the price allowing the competitors to real their hand and price accordingly. BRAVO Excellent job on Sony.

With the PS4 PRO, it was a rumored leak, and this whole time Sony has been tightlipped and made no teasers available. Which made a lot of fans speculate on the capabilities of this machine i.e backwards compatibility from PS1 to PS4, native 4k etc.

Then MS came out with the reveal of the Scorpio which most felt MS was stupid to announce it as early as they did as this would allow Sony to upgrade their specs and come at a very comparable system in terms of GPU power compared to the Scorpio and also have a year head start.

Then the reveal came and the rumored specs were the actual specs. It seems to me that most people are disappointed that Sony did not increase their specs i.e overclock gpu to increase TF's and by doing so they have given MS a fighting chance in this gen. That conference made alot of people sad, no new Vita, no rockstar game reveal. no backwards capability. Lesson learned most of these insiders are full of shit.



I'm getting a Scorpio. Microsoft's hunger has placed them in a great place for gamers. Sony's cockiness of being first has put them exactly where they've been with the PS3 launch. There were signs last holiday where they released zero exclusives.