| CAR-DEN | 2 |
TB-ATL | LOL |
MIN-TEN | LOL |
CLE-PHI | LOL |
| CIN-NYJ | LOL |
OAK-NO | LOL |
SD-KC | LOL | BUF-BAL | LOL |
| CHI-HOU | LOL | GB-JAX | LOL |
MIA-SEA | LOL | NYG-DAL | LOL |
| DET-IND | LOL | NE-ARI | LOL |
PIT-WAS | 1 |
LA-SF | SF by 6 |
Who will win Super Bowl LI? | |||
| New England Patriots | 51 | 47.66% | |
| Kansas City Chiefs | 3 | 2.80% | |
| Pittsburgh Steelers | 6 | 5.61% | |
| Other (AFC) | 3 | 2.80% | |
| Dallas Cowboys | 10 | 9.35% | |
| Atlanta Falcons | 15 | 14.02% | |
| Seattle Seahawks | 5 | 4.67% | |
| Green Bay Packers | 5 | 4.67% | |
| Other (NFC) | 4 | 3.74% | |
| Scoreboard | 5 | 4.67% | |
| Total: | 107 | ||
| CAR-DEN | 2 |
TB-ATL | LOL |
MIN-TEN | LOL |
CLE-PHI | LOL |
| CIN-NYJ | LOL |
OAK-NO | LOL |
SD-KC | LOL | BUF-BAL | LOL |
| CHI-HOU | LOL | GB-JAX | LOL |
MIA-SEA | LOL | NYG-DAL | LOL |
| DET-IND | LOL | NE-ARI | LOL |
PIT-WAS | 1 |
LA-SF | SF by 6 |


| LudicrousSpeed said:
|
LOL is always the correct pick.

The Rams are the only team shut out in week one. So glad I don't cheer for that team anymore.
Switch Code: SW-7377-9189-3397 -- Nintendo Network ID: theRepublic -- Steam ID: theRepublic
Now Playing
Switch - Super Mario Maker 2 (2019)
3DS - Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney (Trilogy) (2005/2014)
Mobile - Yugioh Duel Links (2017)
Mobile - Super Mario Run (2017)
PC - Borderlands 2 (2012)
PC - Deep Rock Galactic (2020)
I told you guys the Rams suck. I was scared and lowered my spread when I was informed the 49ers suck. Apparently they don't suck as bad as the Rams.
I knew I should have changed my pick to SF by 28. What a way for the Rams to start their first year back in LA lol.
Dear god lol
Rams trying very hard to eclipse the Lakers for most embarrassing team in the city
The first real stomp carried out by the 49ers and Gabbert? Rams must be that bad.
I thought about that Rawls for Lacy trade btw Rol, and I didnt reject it just to spite you lol. Just that Rawls really seems like he'll be sharing the RB duties with a much improved Michaels this year where as Lacy is the Packers' lone go to guy.
RolStoppable said:
The Packers have Starks who might not get the workhorse role, but commonly gets an increased number of snaps when Lacy's running style doesn't quite work in a game. Basically, if Lacy struggles, his chances to see a surge in the second half are greatly limited due to less time on the field. Anyway, looks like I'll have to settle with Rawls against L.A. while you'll have Lacy against Minnesota. Since Michaels didn't impress in week 1, Rawls could actually get more snaps now, rather than less than half of them. Knowing my luck, the Rams are going to play like a football team in week 2. Well, at least their defense (which will impact my fantasy team). I have no hope for that offense. |
Didn't get to watch any of the games as I just got back from vacation, but looking at the stats I'd say Michaels was fairly impressive, even with his longest run of 17 yards called back he averaged around 4.5 yards per carry. That's quite respectable
| Farsala said: The first real stomp carried out by the 49ers and Gabbert? Rams must be that bad. |
Friend at work told me that Gabbert has been looking good so far with the 49ers (I assume during the preseason). He must be a changed man after coming from Jaguars. The Jags tend to bring anyone down though it seems.