By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - Is Donald Trump a sociopath?

 

Is Donald Trump a sociopath?

Yes 303 60.84%
 
No 195 39.16%
 
Total:498
fatslob-:O said:
JustcallmeRiff said:

Quoting someone is not a smear campaign, lying about someone is "Obama is the founder of ISIS" " I don't believe Obama was born in the US" if you say something enough the poorly educated will believe you"I love the poorly educated and they love me"

I'm not here to defend Donald Drumpf's patently erroneous statements like these but I know enough is enough when you people are crossing the line of civility that not even the secret service that you guys were recently sucking up to actually made this an affair to be reckoned with ... 

You guys disappoint me since you advertised yourselves as "reasonable" but even you guys are blinded in your own anger enough to perpetuate falsehoods about or demonize Drumpf for the things he's not ... 

What makes you people better than Drumpf if you guys admonish him for the SAME things that YOUR GUILTY of, hypocrite much I say ? 

I only keep losing faith in human logic when I see more extremism especially from the supporters of the left ... 

What makes me better than Trump?  Maybe I'm not better than Trump.  Maybe I'm worse.  But that doesn't really matter, because I'm not fucking running for president.  If I ever decide to run for President I highly highly suggest that you don't vote for me.  I'd be an awful awful president, because I can be irritable, I have some emotional and personality disorders, and I can frankly be a dick sometimes... ok a lot of the time.

Like, it's ok for me to say "what's a nuclear triad derf".  Becasue I'M NOT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT.

It's ok for me to say someone should shove a firecracked up Hillary Clinton's asshole. Because I'M NOT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT.

It's ok for me to say Obama is the leader of ISIS and Clay Aiken is the leader of the Taliban. Because I'M NOT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT.

It's ok for me to not know that Russia invaded the Ukraine.  Because I'M NOT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT.

It's ok for me to say that Mexicans are rapists, drug dealers, murderers, and some, I assume are good people.  Because I'M NOT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT.  (Actually that's not ok for me cause I work with Mexican kids most of whom are perfectly lovely and if I said that I'd be fired and probably blackballed from any urban school).

It's ok for me to say we should put Muslims in a registry.  Because I'M NOT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT.  (Errr... that one's not ok either, because I work with Muslim kids, who are also perfectly lovely, and whose parents want them to succeed and become doctors and not suicide bombers, and if I said that I'd be rightfully fired).

It's ok for me to mock a handicapped reporter.  Because I'M NOT RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT. 

It's ok for me ADVOCATE MOTHER FUCKING WAR CRIMES LIKE KILLING THE FAMILIES OF ENEMY COMBATANTS AND TORTURING PRISONERS.  Because I'M NOT RUNNING PRESIDENT.  

And, it's ok for me to demonize Donald Trump.  It's ok for me to say he's an evil, sheep ball sucking, Urkel fucking, rancid, psycopathic, cum guzzling, hood wearing, cross burning, bottom feeding, daughter screwing, tiny handed, pussy ass, wigged, repugnant, ignorant, foul smelling, demented, pillow biting, shrivelled up orange turd.  It's ok for me to say that I hope someone shoots that cock sucker right between the eyes to save the world from his stupidity.  

Cause I'm not running for president. And I can admonish Trump for things I might do, because I realize my faults should completely and utterly disqualify me from literally being given enough power to destroy the world.  At the end of the day, I'm some douchebag on the internet.  I sincerely hope that the President is someone who is far better than me, and I hope you do too.



Around the Network

I don't even think he's a terrible person, I do find him occasionally entertaining ... he's just a bad candidate for the job of president.

Because the job is not a joke, and he's just way to deficient in too many areas to realistically not run the country into the shitter.

It's not just an issue of right vs. left, Mitt Romney was 100x more qualified to be president than Trump is and had the character, humility, and level headedness to be able to execute the position.

I can't really even feel sorry for him because the piling on that's going on right now is brought on by his own comments. 



Soundwave said:

I don't even think he's a terrible person, I do find him occasionally entertaining ... he's just a bad candidate for the job of president.

Because the job is not a joke, and he's just way to deficient in too many areas to realistically not run the country into the shitter.

It's not just an issue of right vs. left, Mitt Romney was 100x more qualified to be president than Drumpf is and had the character, humility, and level headedness to be able to execute the position.

I can't really even feel sorry for him because the piling on that's going on right now is brought on by his own comments. 

I think he is a terrible person.  Beyond the kinds of things he says, I think it makes you a terrible person to run for president while being unwilling to even study things like world affairs on a rudimentary level.  Wanting the power to send people to war without this kind of knowledge is truly despicable.



JWeinCom said:
Soundwave said:

I don't even think he's a terrible person, I do find him occasionally entertaining ... he's just a bad candidate for the job of president.

Because the job is not a joke, and he's just way to deficient in too many areas to realistically not run the country into the shitter.

It's not just an issue of right vs. left, Mitt Romney was 100x more qualified to be president than Drumpf is and had the character, humility, and level headedness to be able to execute the position.

I can't really even feel sorry for him because the piling on that's going on right now is brought on by his own comments. 

I think he is a terrible person.  Beyond the kinds of things he says, I think it makes you a terrible person to run for president while being unwilling to even study things like world affairs on a rudimentary level.  Wanting the power to send people to war without this kind of knowledge is truly despicable.

Obviously though I agree he shouldn't be 1000 feet within the White House. I find him occassionally funny but I am speaking from an entertainment POV only, though usually I mean funny in not a flattering way. If he was a movie character, it would be very funny, but this is real life. 



Soundwave said:
JWeinCom said:

I think he is a terrible person.  Beyond the kinds of things he says, I think it makes you a terrible person to run for president while being unwilling to even study things like world affairs on a rudimentary level.  Wanting the power to send people to war without this kind of knowledge is truly despicable.

Obviously though I agree he shouldn't be 1000 feet within the White House. I find him occassionally funny but I am speaking from an entertainment POV only, though usually I mean funny in not a flattering way. If he was a movie character, it would be very funny, but this is real life. 

Doesn't going for that job when he should know he's unqualified and taking no effort to become more qualified make him a terrible person?



Around the Network

@JWeinCom So we should automatically feel alienated about our VERY OWN CITIZENS despite the only difference being that they're presidential candidates, am I right ?! That's just naive when we have MANY past examples of leaders in history that says otherwise for their war crimes, leaders only exist to deliver what they want or in the case of a democracy what the people want. They have NO OBLIGATION and I repeat NO OBLIGATION to be the best individual in a nation relative to anyone's measures and even in a democracy it DOES NOT GUARANTEE that no matter how much you wish it ...

NOTHING and I mean NOTHING will absolutely change that FACT for whatever anyone says ...



Trump is a pathological liar, an attention seeker and a poor loser. Many people are eagerly waiting for Trump's tantrum when he inevitably loses the US presidential election.



That's an insult to sociopaths... but since it was the best answer at my disposal I voted yes.



fatslob-:O said:

@JWeinCom So we should automatically feel alienated about our VERY OWN CITIZENS despite the only difference being that they're presidential candidates, am I right ?! That's just naive when we have MANY past examples of leaders in history that says otherwise for their war crimes, leaders only exist to deliver what they want or in the case of a democracy what the people want. They have NO OBLIGATION and I repeat NO OBLIGATION to be the best individual in a nation relative to anyone's measures and even in a democracy it DOES NOT GUARANTEE that no matter how much you wish it ...

NOTHING and I mean NOTHING will absolutely change that FACT for whatever anyone says ...

YES!!! YES WE SHOULD! YES YOU ARE RIGHT! Because the "only difference" of being a presidential candidate is a BIG FUCKING DIFFERENCE!  I expect my team's quarterback to be better at throwing a ball then me.  I expect my surgeon to be better at surgery than me.  I expect my mechanic to know more about cars than me.  And I expect my presidential candidates to be better than me at making informed decisions, knowing about foreign policy, and not engendering hatred and violence.  THEY WILL HAVE THE POWER TO END THE FUCKING WORLD AND THAT IS NOT A FUCKING EXAGGERATION!  THEY WILL LITERALLY HAVE THE FUCKING POWER TO END THE WORLD! THEY WILL LITERALLY HAVE THE FUCKING POWER TO END THE WORLD!  I KNOW I'M REPEATING THAT BECAUSE IT'S REALLY FUCKING IMPORTANT!

They don't have any obligation to be anything.  YOU'RE THE ONE WITH THE FUCKING OBLIGATION.  YOU have the obligation to TAKE IT FUCKING SERIOUSLY WHEN A CANDIDATE SAYS HE WOULD FORCE THE ARMED SERVICE TO INTENTIONALLY MURDER CIVILIANS.  YOU have the obligation to TAKE IT FUCKING SERIOUSLY WHEN A CANDIDATE SAYS WE SHOULD CONSIDER A DATABASE FOR MEMBERS OF A CERTAIN RELIGION.  YOU have an obligation to TAKE IT FUCKING SERIOUSLY WHEN A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE DOESN'T KNOW A GOD DAMN THING ABOUT FOREIGN AFFAIRS.  YOU have an obligation to TAKE IT FUCKING SERIOUSLY WHEN A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE SAYS THAT MOST MEMBERS OF A PARTICULAR RACE ARE RAPISTS AND DRUG DEALERS.  YOU have and obligation to TAKE IT SERIOUSLY WHEN A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDAT INCITES RACIAL HATRED BY TWEETING IMAGES THAT SAY 81% OF WHITE HOMOCIDE VICTIMS ARE KILLED BY BLACK PEOPLE.  YOU have the obligation to TAKE IT FUCKING SERIOUSLY WHEN SOMEONE WILL NOT DENOUNCE THE FORMER GRAND WIZARD OF THE KLU KLUX KLAN AND PRETENDS HE DOESN'T KNOW WHO HE IS DESPITE HAVING SPOKEN ABOUT HIM IN PAST INTERVIEWS.  And this is not demonizing.  Trump has said all of these things point blank. 

I know that democracy doesn't guarantee the best candidate or a particularly good one.  I know that because about 90% of my family was killed by a democratically elected leader, and it's simply dumb luck that my family got kicked out of Germany before shit went down, or else I wouldn't be here right now.  And you know how leaders like that get into power?

WHEN PEOPLE DON'T HOLD THEIR CANDIDATES TO HIGHER FUCKING STANDARDS THAN RANDOM FUCKERS ON A GOD DAMN VIDEO GAME MESSAGE BOARD AND ARE WILLING TO LOOK THE OTHER WAY WHEN CANDIDATES OPENLY SUGGEST VIOLENCE, INCITE RACISM, ADVOCATE WAR CRIMES, AND GENERALLY SHOW THEMSELVES TO BE IGNORANT DERANGED FUCKTARDS.

God damn it.  I don't even have anything against  the legitimate Trump supporters.  If you're the kind of person who is ignorant enough to actually support that shit, then you're too god damn stupid to even be angry at.  It's like getting angry at a dog for rubbing its ass on the carpet.  What pisses me off, frankly, is people like you.  I'm fairly sure that you're smart enough to realize how dangerous the shit Trump is saying is, and I'm fairly sure you're decent enough to not support it.  But for whatever reason, you refuse to actually hold Trump accountable for any of it.  I mean, to be more upset about liberals being uncivil to Trump than Trump advocating this shit... What the fuck.  If you honestly don't expect more from YOUR choice for president than you expect out of some fucker like me on the internet, then you're part of the problem.



JWeinCom said:

YES!!! YES WE SHOULD! YES YOU ARE RIGHT! Because the "only difference" of being a presidential candidate is a BIG FUCKING DIFFERENCE!  I expect my team's quarterback to be better at throwing a ball then me.  I expect my surgeon to be better at surgery than me.  I expect my mechanic to know more about cars than me.  And I expect my presidential candidates to be better than me at making informed decisions, knowing about foreign policy, and not engendering hatred and violence.  THEY WILL HAVE THE POWER TO END THE FUCKING WORLD AND THAT IS NOT A FUCKING EXAGGERATION!  THEY WILL LITERALLY HAVE THE FUCKING POWER TO END THE WORLD! THEY WILL LITERALLY HAVE THE FUCKING POWER TO END THE WORLD!  I KNOW I'M REPEATING THAT BECAUSE IT'S REALLY FUCKING IMPORTANT!

They don't have any obligation to be anything.  YOU'RE THE ONE WITH THE FUCKING OBLIGATION.  YOU have the obligation to TAKE IT FUCKING SERIOUSLY WHEN A CANDIDATE SAYS HE WOULD FORCE THE ARMED SERVICE TO INTENTIONALLY MURDER CIVILIANS.  YOU have the obligation to TAKE IT FUCKING SERIOUSLY WHEN A CANDIDATE SAYS WE SHOULD CONSIDER A DATABASE FOR MEMBERS OF A CERTAIN RELIGION.  YOU have an obligation to TAKE IT FUCKING SERIOUSLY WHEN A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE DOESN'T KNOW A GOD DAMN THING ABOUT FOREIGN AFFAIRS.  YOU have an obligation to TAKE IT FUCKING SERIOUSLY WHEN A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE SAYS THAT MOST MEMBERS OF A PARTICULAR RACE ARE RAPISTS AND DRUG DEALERS.  YOU have and obligation to TAKE IT SERIOUSLY WHEN A PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDAT INCITES RACIAL HATRED BY TWEETING IMAGES THAT SAY 81% OF WHITE HOMOCIDE VICTIMS ARE KILLED BY BLACK PEOPLE.  YOU have the obligation to TAKE IT FUCKING SERIOUSLY WHEN SOMEONE WILL NOT DENOUNCE THE FORMER GRAND WIZARD OF THE KLU KLUX KLAN AND PRETENDS HE DOESN'T KNOW WHO HE IS DESPITE HAVING SPOKEN ABOUT HIM IN PAST INTERVIEWS.  And this is not demonizing.  Trump has said all of these things point blank. 

I know that democracy doesn't guarantee the best candidate or a particularly good one.  I know that because about 90% of my family was killed by a democratically elected leader, and it's simply dumb luck that my family got kicked out of Germany before shit went down, or else I wouldn't be here right now.  And you know how leaders like that get into power?

WHEN PEOPLE DON'T HOLD THEIR CANDIDATES TO HIGHER FUCKING STANDARDS THAN RANDOM FUCKERS ON A GOD DAMN VIDEO GAME MESSAGE BOARD AND ARE WILLING TO LOOK THE OTHER WAY WHEN CANDIDATES OPENLY SUGGEST VIOLENCE, INCITE RACISM, ADVOCATE WAR CRIMES, AND GENERALLY SHOW THEMSELVES TO BE IGNORANT DERANGED FUCKTARDS.

God damn it.  I don't even have anything against  the legitimate Trump supporters.  If you're the kind of person who is ignorant enough to actually support that shit, then you're too god damn stupid to even be angry at.  It's like getting angry at a dog for rubbing its ass on the carpet.  What pisses me off, frankly, is people like you.  I'm fairly sure that you're smart enough to realize how dangerous the shit Trump is saying is, and I'm fairly sure you're decent enough to not support it.  But for whatever reason, you refuse to actually hold Trump accountable for any of it.  I mean, to be more upset about liberals being uncivil to Trump than Trump advocating this shit... What the fuck.  If you honestly don't expect more from YOUR choice for president than you expect out of some fucker like me on the internet, then you're part of the problem.

Problem is those professions DO have clear criteria, being a "great" president or a leader on the other hand does NOT, that is FINAL! 

You are right that WE as CITIZENS do have an obligation but that does NOT mean we have or share a COMMON GOAL! 

If you know what democracy doesn't guarantee then why fucking fight about it when your at the mercy at the decision of millions of other people ? 

Again, that's their decision to make and you should hold higher standards for every voter out there BECAUSE THEIR THE ONES WHO'S GOING TO FUCK SHIT UP DAMNIT IF THEY DEMAND IT! 

No you DO have something against legitimate Trump supporters if you think they're "TOO GOD DAMN STUPID" to be angry at but real life isn't quite as noble or rosy as you even remotely make it out to be since there are people out there other than Trump who ACTUALLY think like that and ignoring a problem is just stupid when you see tens of millions of them which isn't going away for a long time and quite frankly the president being better than the common man is a load of BULL-FUCKING-SHIT when the guy that you put in the office is only reflects what the citizens their BEST WISHES. The ONLY way your concerns will ever be put to rest is if you start by directly IMPROVING THE COMMON MAN and not just you but that goes for EVERY one of Trump's detractors otherwise you will get something like #Brexit which was also based on hate or fears ... 

EVERYONE IS ALWAYS AT THE MERCY OF HOPE FROM OTHERS IN A DEMOCRACY ... 

As it is if you don't want to face the problem at hand then just hope that they don't vote Trump much like how the others do hope that they do vote for him as if this is a NEVER ENDING CYCLE ...