By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - To Pride or Not to Pride - Resolved

 

Should I go to NYC Pride

Yes - Don't Live in Fear 26 70.27%
 
Yes - Bring a Gun 5 13.51%
 
No - People are too crazy/Stay Home 3 8.11%
 
See Results 3 8.11%
 
Total:37

CosmicSex I would massively suggest you go, and know this, if anyone should attack you while you are there showing pride in what you stand for, know that the world you leave will be one which will be far more accepting of people on your side, than against you. I know for you it will be the end if something like that was to happen, but like I said, if there is an attack on such a thing, you know it should turn even the strongest of the "anti LGBT" thinking public around, even if just a small bit, to see that evil terrorists is the end game of those thoughts and feelings of hatred towards how people love.

Hmmm that's a bit of a block of text right there, and I'm tired so sorry if it isn't clear.
But if you go and get killed by evil fuckers, you know the world will be a far more pro gay place after you!

Don't live in fear man, terrorist want that, if they achieve it, then freedoms are lost. Sad times.



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive

Around the Network

I am a gay male who is not very interested in pride events. I would definitely go though if it meant I could stand up to those who would terrorise me and people like me for our sexuality.



To pride is the answer. If you want to but don't dare to, you've already lost. The risk is almost non-existant
(even though it does exist), so I think not going would be almost foolish if you want to.



I went and I had an absolute blast!



Slimebeast said:

It's easy to say "do not let the terrorists win" and "don't let fear rule you", when the risk of getting harmed is so extremely small (as it is in a parade with over 100,000 participants, insane security and awareness, and statistically a very small risk of an attack).

But in truth, it's quite hypocritical.

"Je sui Charlie", eh? My ass. It was so easy to write a message on twitter and boast about it where nobody could reach you, but completely different to do something in reality. As soon as the risk becomes significant, we run like chicken. We won't go, we won't talk, we won't write.

Like the aftermath of the terror attack on the French satiric magazine Charlie Ebdo proved one and a half years ago. The terrorists actually won. Nobody paints Muhammad cartoons anymore, not even Charlie Ebdo. People are in general extremely careful to provoke islam. If they do it, it's from a completely safe position. Noble ideas of "don't let fear rule over you" are completely out the window.

As another example, think about the situation in other parts of the world where values are very different and human rights aren't respected in the same way. For example, think of any Muslim country in the world today. Would you go to a gay parade or to a gay club? Would you stand up for human rights and walk with them in solidarity? In countries where the punishment for being homosexual is severe, possibly even the death penalty. And if the authorities wouldn't arrest you, chances are high you'd instead be mauled by an angry mob. No, we wouldn't go. But in these places sometimes, very rarely, people actually go out and show their true selves and provoke the society knowing these risks, but sadly they also face these consequenses. These people are heroes. But they're very rare.

Meanwhile we in the West, we are so moral, we stand up for values and care about the weak. That's what we think, totally ignorant to reality growing up in a small safe bubble.

When we go it's only when the risk is extremely small, not because of a noble cause that is more important than a significant risk. Do not pretend otherwise.

I only had time to skim this post but I want to look at it and "drink it in". Very well thought out from what I've seen. I may or may not reply.