CosmicSex said:
Johnw1104 said:
What's funny, though, is Clinton has been the more Warhawky of the two. We'll soon have a debate where the Republican was against the Iraq war, is an isolationist, and is against free trade, while the Democrat is in favor of free trade, was married to the architect of some of the most important free trade agreements, and voted for both the Afghan and Iraq wars.
I have such a morbid curiosity about how these debates will go... hell, Gary Johnson has a great chance of hitting 15% and participating as well.
|
Thats not whatI am saying. I am saying that from the evidence I have gathered watching these two candidates actions over the last few months has made it clear that I don't trust him in that position. As someone mentioned, Trump is too much of a liability and it would be irresponsible for me too endorse thim at a ballot. Not voting is an endorsement for him in my mind when I have been given more stable alternative.
Lol in other words he is crazy and I care about the extreme consequences of him being President.
|
I don't trust him either. Really, it's not "Donald Trump" that's running for president, as in the man you can go back and see in interviews from the 80's through early 2000's. Rather, it's his reality TV persona that has run, and it has him floating about without any kind of foundation to stand on. We know his past stances, but as of this moment his current ones can literally change three times over the course of a day (such as his waffling position on abortion recently). He is doing nothing more than saying whatever appears to be most popular and gets the most cheers, and if he misfires he simply denies that stance and adopts a more popular one.
He's the political equivalent to Mr. Magoo, flailing about blindly but somehow having it work out for him in the end. It's really rather remarkable. In the end, his one appeal is that he's (clearly) not a puppet of one party or the other, and that alone seems to be winning people over.