I always have read the complaints when Fromsoftware announced DSIII: another Souls, really? Call of Soulsborne etc etc.

Despite that i dont like Dark Souls 3 as much as i adore Bloodborne i still love this game. I get so much enjoyment out from these Souls games what is wrong about them doing it every year? I really dont get how can people complaing. 

I really hope that Fromsoftware continious to make a new Souls game every year, espacially in this gaming industry where they are charging us 70€ for a brand new AAA game @day 1 or the long delays and waiting time of up to 2 years for a new game. Dark Souls 3 is worth every penny you pay for and every minute you waited for it to be released. 

I cant wait for Ni Oh and Deep Down as well, so more AAA Souls/hard games so better.

They're too long to release yearly in my opinion. I would stop buying them unless the games were exceptional compared to their predecessors, as I really don't have the time to put 40-80 hours into a souls game every year that plays very much like the previous title. Plus they don't change enough for yearly releases. Bi-yearly would be okay, but I think 3-4 years between release would be good. Make the next game bigger and better. Dark Souls 3 is great, but it isn't enough of a departure from Dark Souls and Dark Souls II for me to justify its sequel being next year.

you dont have to buy them every year

I don't mind! Souls games are the best in gaming, each giving me +150 hours of entertainment, and each having superb quality. I don't mind getting them each year.

From is amazing because they're so productive.

Sure I don't have to, but like I said: I'd rather they put more time and effort into development and innovations than to fall into the Pokemon trap of incremental changes. And if a lot of people are like me, the sales can slouch. Look at Assassin's Creed and Call of Duty - both much bigger series than Souls that have slowed down a bit due to yearly releases. You might be alright with a yearly Dark Souls game now, but if it means the series stagnates (like these series had) then your tune might change.

I will also like to add that I don't consider Bloodborne and Demon's Souls to be a problem if they come between Dark Souls releases in a yearly fashion. They are different enough from Dark Souls to merit a separate release schedule.

Nah, I would hate if the Souls series was reduced to codesque garbage. No matter how much you like a series you need a break from it occasionally or else you'll eventually burn out. Look at the hype Kingdom Hearts 3 is generating. The only reason thats happening is because people had to wait. Same thing with Final Fantasy XV.

I honestly don't prefer the Souls series at all. the way the series plays puts me off and isn't my jam tbh, I just want FS to make a few new Armored Core games or at least get back on track with that franchise.

I'm not gonna lie, but I really want another Bloodborne game, I'm not sure why but there is something about european or eerie london atmosphere to be specific that I like, and after playing Bloodborne, DSIII seemed kinda too easy. But I'm not sure I'd like a yearly souls game.

I wouldn't mind a Souls game every two year and a Bloodborne every year between.

it doesnt suck, bloodborne has some of the best graphics ever made