By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Uncharted 4: A Thief's End Review Thread - MC: 93 / GR: 92.70%

Tagged games:

Baryonyx said:
KLXVER said:

Thats not a good idea. It goes against the freedom of speech. This just proves that we are just as bad as people who want to censor games.

So freedom of speech doesn't work both ways? People can't protest anymore cause it violate someone elses freedom of speech? 

People have the Right to protest, as much as other people have the right to be a troll, the loudest voice wins and that is justice at best, because the loudest voice is the majority,  usually and that is the way it should work, if people want that review to be there, they have the right to vote for it to stay.

Don't be Anti-free speech when people have the right to vote for their own freedom of speech.

Yeah, because most people want games to be censored. The loudest voices might win, but they are usually not the majority. If a person cant give it the score they want, even if its stupid, then whats the point of reviews at all? The game still has a 93. I think its safe to say that this game is good.



Around the Network

Wow the 4/10 score has been keeping this thread alive for a while now after being practically dead for 2 days before the score.



KLXVER said:
Baryonyx said:

So freedom of speech doesn't work both ways? People can't protest anymore cause it violate someone elses freedom of speech? 

People have the Right to protest, as much as other people have the right to be a troll, the loudest voice wins and that is justice at best, because the loudest voice is the majority,  usually and that is the way it should work, if people want that review to be there, they have the right to vote for it to stay.

Don't be Anti-free speech when people have the right to vote for their own freedom of speech.

Yeah, because most people want games to be censored. The loudest voices might win, but they are usually not the majority. If a person cant give it the score they want, even if its stupid, then whats the point of reviews at all? The game still has a 93. I think its safe to say that this game is good.

People still have the right to protest.

Actually, i lose faith in the dignity of Reviews when people like him can manipulate the out-come of a score simply because he can, it's not a review either, it's pure bash. So people should voice their opinion that this guy is nothing but a fraud, cause he abused the system and people should have the right to express their anger. If you oppose it, it's your choice and your voice but they aren't ruining anything.

This is a trend that web-sites do for click-baits, so their intentions aren't pure as a real review and should not be included and people should fight for that, so that this trend will not repeat itself. You are only supporting the voice of each individuell matters more then others, it's double-morale at it's finest. Everyone got the right to vote, that is Democracy.



 

PSN: Opticstrike90
Steam: opticstrike90

Baryonyx said:
KLXVER said:

Yeah, because most people want games to be censored. The loudest voices might win, but they are usually not the majority. If a person cant give it the score they want, even if its stupid, then whats the point of reviews at all? The game still has a 93. I think its safe to say that this game is good.

People still have the right to protest.

Actually, i lose faith in the dignity of Reviews when people like him can manipulate the out-come of a score simply because he can, it's not a review either, it's pure bash. So people should voice their opinion that this guy is nothing but a fraud, cause he abused the system and people should have the right to express their anger. If you oppose it, it's your choice and your voice but they aren't ruining anything.

This is a trend that web-sites do for click-baits, so their intentions aren't pure as a real review and should not be included and people should fight for that, so that this trend will not repeat itself. You are only supporting the voice of each individuell matters more then others, it's double-morale at it's finest. Everyone got the right to vote, that is Democracy.

People have the right to protest, sure. They dont have the right to tell people what to think though. Its just one guys opinion. We dont know if he did it for the clicks or its what he really believes. People have the right to protest against violence or sexual content in entertainment as well, but at the end of the day, its still censorship.



Baryonyx said:
KLXVER said:

Yeah, because most people want games to be censored. The loudest voices might win, but they are usually not the majority. If a person cant give it the score they want, even if its stupid, then whats the point of reviews at all? The game still has a 93. I think its safe to say that this game is good.

People still have the right to protest.

Actually, i lose faith in the dignity of Reviews when people like him can manipulate the out-come of a score simply because he can, it's not a review either, it's pure bash. So people should voice their opinion that this guy is nothing but a fraud, cause he abused the system and people should have the right to express their anger. If you oppose it, it's your choice and your voice but they aren't ruining anything.

This is a trend that web-sites do for click-baits, so their intentions aren't pure as a real review and should not be included and people should fight for that, so that this trend will not repeat itself. You are only supporting the voice of each individuell matters more then others, it's double-morale at it's finest. Everyone got the right to vote, that is Democracy.

I feel the same as you!



Around the Network
KLXVER said:
Baryonyx said:

People still have the right to protest.

Actually, i lose faith in the dignity of Reviews when people like him can manipulate the out-come of a score simply because he can, it's not a review either, it's pure bash. So people should voice their opinion that this guy is nothing but a fraud, cause he abused the system and people should have the right to express their anger. If you oppose it, it's your choice and your voice but they aren't ruining anything.

This is a trend that web-sites do for click-baits, so their intentions aren't pure as a real review and should not be included and people should fight for that, so that this trend will not repeat itself. You are only supporting the voice of each individuell matters more then others, it's double-morale at it's finest. Everyone got the right to vote, that is Democracy.

People have the right to protest, sure. They dont have the right to tell people what to think though. Its just one guys opinion. We dont know if he did it for the clicks or its what he really believes. People have the right to protest against violence or sexual content in entertainment as well, but at the end of the day, its still censorship.

So don't tell them what to do or not then, that makes you just as bad as them in your own words, don't silence other people freedom of speech.

 

it's a click-bait, that is something which have already been covered if you bothered to read what people found out about the guy and the entire situation.. He mocked the game on Twitter, so he was hating on it badly, and read the review, it's clearly just bashing on most part and it lack proper explaination of things.

 

I don't wanna have this discussion anymore, i just end up getting moderated and banned 



 

PSN: Opticstrike90
Steam: opticstrike90

Baryonyx said:
KLXVER said:

People have the right to protest, sure. They dont have the right to tell people what to think though. Its just one guys opinion. We dont know if he did it for the clicks or its what he really believes. People have the right to protest against violence or sexual content in entertainment as well, but at the end of the day, its still censorship.

So don't tell them what to do or not then, that makes you just as bad as them in your own words, don't silence other people freedom of speech.

 

it's a click-bait, that is something which have already been covered if you bothered to read what people found out about the guy and the entire situation.. He mocked the game on Twitter, so he was hating on it badly, and read the review, it's clearly just bashing on most part and it lack proper explaination of things.

 

I don't wanna have this discussion anymore, i just end up getting moderated and banned 

I dont tell people what to do. I just said it was not a good idea to try and censor someones opinion. He has the right to write a negative review. He has the right to bash the game. Its not very professional, but like you said: Dont tell people what to do or not.



I don't understand. Does Uncharted 4 getting a 4/10 from one idiot really upset you guys this much?

Does it make you enjoy the game any less?

Do you think this one bogus review will keep people from buying the game?

All you're doing by beating this dead horse is giving the reviewer the attention he wanted when he posted the review.

How about we all go play some Uncharted 4 multiplayer rather than sitting here crying because 1 guy out of hundreds didn't like the game as much as we did.

Seriously? A petition to remove one bad review from a game we didn't create, design, publish or profit from? I think it's time we grow up and get our priorities in order.



Let's all agree to stop posting in this thread at 999 posts.



.



Predictions for end of 2014 HW sales:

 PS4: 17m   XB1: 10m    WiiU: 10m   Vita: 10m