| marc said: Controller vibration - most gamers dont care if this included or not. Its would be nice to have but its not a console maker or breaker, so it doesnt matter. Blue Ray - It doesnt translate to a much better movie experience than HD so why even bother making a new format to begin with? Simple, they want to win this so called format war so that they can make money from selling the license. In other words, it didnt have to happen but Sony got greedy. The extra capacity is not needed nor will it be used in this generation of gaming or movies. Some companies claimed they needed the space but it was only because they chose not to compress things properly. There are no games in the market coming or otherwise that need 9gigs of space save for some MMO's on the PC. No console game should even come close. Format War? - Imho, there isnt one. Since the formats are currently so volatile (we should see 100gig discs very soon), it will be impossible to pin down any single format. Plus people are generally happy with normal DVD. A normal person really cant tell the difference between DVD and HD or blue ray nor do they care to. This isnt like the days of VHS vs DVD. This is just DVD1 vs DVD2 vs DVD3 to the common consumer. They are all DVD as far as they are concerned and since consoles will barely penetrate about 10% of all households, I dont think any definitive change is going to happen. I think that DVD will remain, and HD and Blue Ray movies will be phased out like Beta vs VHS years ago. VHS won because they simply had a larger install base despite being lower quality. If I had to pick between HD & blue ray however, ill place my money on HD. Blue ray has more capacity but HD is cheaper and already has decent penetration. |
Ever since the game industry switched from cartridges to disks, game designers have been trying to speed up load times, one of the ways to do this is to make sure nothing on the disk is compressed, which means the new formats, although the reading speed is slow, may load as fast as DVDs. Also the contest is pretty much over as Blu-Ray has won, like shown in the http://www.eproductwars.com/dvd/ link.
In reference to Holographic disks: http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1759907,00.asp
"And in the case of InPhase, the company already has a variety of vendors interested in its technology. First out of the gate is Sony Corp., which already has demonstrated a holographic ROM technology using InPhase's Tapestry media that enables backward read compatibility with DVD and CD formats."
So Sony is already developing this, so chances are, this will be in a PS4, or like with Microsoft, have an add-on to play them. Also the talk of DVDs being adquate is basically wrong. I have C & C generals and BF1942 which use up four disks, and unlike on the computer, you cannot install the game to avoid using more than one disk-except maybe? with the PS3.
Also R:FOM used up about 14 gigs (http://www.ps3forums.com/showthread.php?t=65579 [think what you will about the other arguements presented there]) as (and I quote) "Resistance also had 30 single-player chapters, six multiplayer maps, uncompressed audio streaming, and high-definition mpegs. That all added up to a lot of space on the disc." So if you have games on Blu-Ray, chances are you're going to get a lot of time out of it, even without replaying it, instead of DVDs.
One person's experience or opinion never shows the general consensus
PSN ID: Tispower
MSN: tispower1@hotmail.co.uk








. Though the reader will be about $2000 




