By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - 1 Hour of Quantum Break Gameplay

Normchacho said:
Azzanation said:

http://n4g.com/news/1861490/xbox-one-exclusive-quantum-break-now-has-no-input-lag-smooth-frame-rate-pr-head-talks-preview-event

Oh, so it's not "many people" it's their head of PR. Now, every game has some input lag, but he could be right that it has very little.

Ya who knew the people who made the game promoting their own product. "many people" at MS/remedy.

There is always going to be input lag. It is physically impossible to have no lag due to the finite speed of light and the processing required on both controller and the console.

Thats like saying "ya man my internet has 0ms lag" not possible.



Around the Network

One thing I've noticed is that the gameplay to cutscene/cgi ratio is really bad. There are long portions where you don't play the game and I've always been told thats bad.
There's also clipping I've noticed where falling debris don't react to the player in a realistic way.
I've also noticed that the gameplay graphics are not really as nice as previously shown during tech previews like here:
http://www.dualshockers.com/2015/08/25/xbox-one-exclusive-quantum-breaks-wip-screenshots-show-advanced-effects-and-comparisons/

also if like some are saying that this is 1/4 the game then that makes for a really short game. Wonder if it will get treated like the order did.



jason1637 said:

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=7YbbUv2Qsic

Why he shoots through the pillars?



elektranine said:
One thing I've noticed is that the gameplay to cutscene/cgi ratio is really bad. There are long portions where you don't play the game and I've always been told thats bad.
There's also clipping I've noticed where falling debris don't react to the player in a realistic way.
I've also noticed that the gameplay graphics are not really as nice as previously shown during tech previews like here:
http://www.dualshockers.com/2015/08/25/xbox-one-exclusive-quantum-breaks-wip-screenshots-show-advanced-effects-and-comparisons/

also if like some are saying that this is 1/4 the game then that makes for a really short game. Wonder if it will get treated like the order did.

Well thé downgrade is official since thzy said many times 900p and then 1080p and now it's not that at all.

They lied about many stuff, and thé analysis of gamersyde explains it well, this game may be good ( if you forget like you said the bad ratio of cinematics cgi/tv show , same thing highly criticized in The Order )but its not what they promised at all, it's more Infamous level of visuals with better models.



Predictions for end of 2014 HW sales:

 PS4: 17m   XB1: 10m    WiiU: 10m   Vita: 10m

 

Azzanation said:
Many have said the game has lagless controls.

The guy in the video says the controls and aiming feel floaty.



Around the Network

The game is amazing yeah i say it with that Avatar :) Finally a story line game. No more pewpewpewpew some AI BOTS and in the middle multiplayer like most games this gen. I hope Remedy make Alan wake games, they SCREAMING all the time on M$ but they don't care. They make only games that sell 5m copies like Halo. MS you don't know sh@@#$ about games. Remedy is very tallented studio



 

 

Aerys said:
elektranine said:
One thing I've noticed is that the gameplay to cutscene/cgi ratio is really bad. There are long portions where you don't play the game and I've always been told thats bad.
There's also clipping I've noticed where falling debris don't react to the player in a realistic way.
I've also noticed that the gameplay graphics are not really as nice as previously shown during tech previews like here:
http://www.dualshockers.com/2015/08/25/xbox-one-exclusive-quantum-breaks-wip-screenshots-show-advanced-effects-and-comparisons/

also if like some are saying that this is 1/4 the game then that makes for a really short game. Wonder if it will get treated like the order did.

Well thé downgrade is official since thzy said many times 900p and then 1080p and now it's not that at all.

They lied about many stuff, and thé analysis of gamersyde explains it well, this game may be good ( if you forget like you said the bad ratio of cinematics cgi/tv show , same thing highly criticized in The Order )but its not what they promised at all, it's more Infamous level of visuals with better models.

Yes that's what I'm wondering. Will this game get criticized for going the exact same things the order did wrong?

I have a sneaking suspicion that reviewers will just choose to gloss over this like they do with "certain" games.

 

The whole graphics thing is what really confuses me. I keep on hearing how this game has such amazing graphics and people always comparing it to Uncharted 4. Even the screenshots from MS are much better than reality. Even when people learned of the 720p resolution they said that didn't mater because of the super great graphics. But that's clearly not the case and the graphics are not that excellent.



What if, the things the Order did wrong, Quantum Break actually does right? I don't think there's anything fundamentally wrong with having a lot of cutscenes. I know some gamers skip them all, but I don't.

Who are these people comparing it with Uncharted 4? PS4 is a more powerful console so I'd expect UC4 to have better graphics. That doesn't change the fact that QB is looking excellent, even DF stated it's visually impressive and at times stunning.



looks awesome !



KiigelHeart said:

There we have it. In that game it was bad but it this game it is good.
What if, the things the Order did wrong, Quantum Break actually does right? I don't think there's anything fundamentally wrong with having a lot of cutscenes. I know some gamers skip them all, but I don't.

Who are these people comparing it with Uncharted 4? PS4 is a more powerful console so I'd expect UC4 to have better graphics. That doesn't change the fact that QB is looking excellent, even DF stated it's visually impressive and at times stunning.

There has been alot of gaming media comparing it to UC4 and saying it's MS's megaton hit. And this gameplay video shows the truth of it not having top tier graphics. There is no way that one can say the previous 'gameplay' screenshots that MS/Remedy released are legit. The graphics are good for the time its releasing but I don't really say exceptional when I see them.

And DF has really lost all credability this gen so them saying its impressive doesn't hold water. This gen they admitted to taking bribes from MS to say that Ryse was the best looking launch game when, in the same writer's oppinion, it was not. How do we know that they are truthful now?