Well, sure, if we're talking about the last gen version. I his case, he was talking about the X1 version.

In my case, I was talking:

Right now, nothing out makes the PC version of the game look last gen. 

I'm not sure what your point is here. Why does it matter if the 60 fps multiplayer is 900p? The part of Uncharted 4 that is comparable to Quantum Break is the singleplayer, and that is 1080p.

I'm not sure what your point is here? 900p/60f is "one step" below the ideal 1080p/60f.
720p/30f is "three steps" below it.

I don't think anyone is arguing that some sacrifices to either of these fields can happen on PS4 as well. But one step down on resolution doesn't compare to two steps down + one step down on the framerates.

QB was developed as a x1 exclusive. I remember the article where they said that it took them like a day t port the x1 game over to windows 10. But it was from the very begining to the end devloped as an x1 exclusive. I just wish I could find the article.

Dead rising 3 was a launch title. Since the launch, the x1 had a power boost from loosing all kinect functionallity, then released an extra core being saved for os to gaming, then direct x12 came out. The x1 is not the same as when it launched. Not that huge of a diference, but it performs better non the less, so its not excusable. 

Just so we can clear up this confusion:

The Order: 1886 will be presented at 1920x800 (which is the CINEMATIC aspect ratio of 2.40:1). At this aspect ratio, you would need a screen resolution of 2592x1080 to avoid the black bars.

Here's why:

The game renders an image of 1920x1080, just 280 horizontal lines are black. For comparisons sake, lets use Forza 5, a full 1080p game. Now if were to tape two black rectangles at the top and botton of our TV screens, you would now be seeing Forza 5 in 1920x800. The picture left displayed is still a 1080p image, the only difference is now only 800 horizontal lines of pixels are visible. Resolution is measured in pixel density, and The Ordermay have a display ratio of 1920x800, but keeps the same pixel density as a 1920x1080 resolution.

Furthermore, what The Order is doing, isn't much different than most Blu-Ray movies. When you watch a 1080p movie, nine out of ten times the movie is in widescreen. Which is the cinematic aspect ratio we talked about before. 2.40:1. The Order will be displaying the same as any 1080p widescreen Blu-Ray movie would.

Source

Lol yes it. You don't know what native 1080p is.

The pixel density might be the same, but not all pixels are used on the screen. For the order to be truely 1080p my screen should have 2560 vertical pixel lines. Given I game on a 4k tv it technically does, but I don't count converted. With UHD (3840 is technically  not 4k that honour goes to 4096) we are finally starting counting vertical pixel lines, so by that logic you can call it 1920p and Full HD, but if 280 pixel lines are not rendered at all I doubt native 1080p is the right name for it. It isn't just an effect since 800x1920 is less heavy for gaming. The order could only support it's 4x MSAA because it needed to render less pixels.

1920x1080= 2,073,600 pixels

1920x800= 1,536,000 pixels

If we look.at the definition of 1080p it is to render 1080 lines progressively not 800, the difference is you have to render 537.600 pixels less, which makes it sub 1080p, but still 1920p.