Open world games; Are big worlds really better?

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Open world games; Are big worlds really better?


Pick one
BIG WORLDS	38	41.30%
small worlds	54	58.70%
Total:	92

DEAD_ORIGINAL

Banned

2,800

413 posts since 11/02/15

Recent Badges:

Leaving Limbo 100 posts on the gamrConnect forums.
Hit And Run 15 comments posted on VGChartz news articles.
1st Birthday Has been a VGChartz member for over 1 year.
Trust Me, It'll Have Legs 100 replies made to user's most popular thread.

DEAD_ORIGINAL on 22 February 2016

Oblivion never forget hitting this women in her house, go outside hit her again kill her knock her down steep cliff then rob her house of plates and bowls and then chuck them down the cliff too, an unforgettable memory!

View Post

Around the Network

bananaking21

Currently Offline

122,485

23078 posts since 05/02/12

Recent Badges:

50 in One Add a total of 50 games to your collection.
Social Butterfly 50 friends on gamrConnect.
Haunted Logged in on Halloween.
Congratulations on Pressing Start! Score your first game in your collection.
Freezing Logged in on Christmas day.
Genocide 5,000 posts on the gamrConnect forums.

Currently Playing:

The Last of Us (PS3)
Far Cry 3 (PC)
God of War: Ascension (PS3)

bananaking21 on 22 February 2016

it depends on density, rather than size. you can have huge open worlds with nothing to do, and boring missions. but some games have smaller worlds with interesting dynamics, and things to do. interesting quests. getting too small can be boring, but also being too big and repetitive is also a drag