Open world games; Are big worlds really better?

Forums - Gaming - Open world games; Are big worlds really better?


Pick one
BIG WORLDS	38	41.30%
small worlds	54	58.70%
Total:	92

DEAD_ORIGINAL

Banned

2,800

413 posts since 11/02/15

Recent Badges:

Leaving Limbo 100 posts on the gamrConnect forums.
1st Birthday Has been a VGChartz member for over 1 year.
Hit And Run 15 comments posted on VGChartz news articles.
Trust Me, It'll Have Legs 100 replies made to user's most popular thread.

DEAD_ORIGINAL on 22 February 2016

Oblivion never forget hitting this women in her house, go outside hit her again kill her knock her down steep cliff then rob her house of plates and bowls and then chuck them down the cliff too, an unforgettable memory!

View Post

Around the Network

bananaking21

Currently Offline

122,485

23078 posts since 05/02/12

Recent Badges:

A Badge Within A Badge Earned 20 badges.
Watch Your Back! Received 10,000 profile views.
Making Friends 10 friends on gamrConnect.
Freezing Logged in on Christmas day.
Ride Into the Sunset Managed to avoid being banned for 3 months.
Escape Artist Managed to avoid being banned for 1 month.

Currently Playing:

The Last of Us (PS3)
Far Cry 3 (PC)
God of War: Ascension (PS3)

bananaking21 on 22 February 2016

it depends on density, rather than size. you can have huge open worlds with nothing to do, and boring missions. but some games have smaller worlds with interesting dynamics, and things to do. interesting quests. getting too small can be boring, but also being too big and repetitive is also a drag