oniyide said:
zorg1000 said:
Answer the question, why would we exclude their strongest market from a discussion about them being mainstream?
It's literally the same thing as asking if Playstation is mainstream then responding no because of Vita sales.
|
Becasue dedicated handheld gaming isnt mainstream, at least not in the US and Europe. Thats why it would be silly to bring up Vita, becasue for all intents and purposes that is not the MAIN show, its home consoles, its always been like that. So we can brag about portable sales all we want that woudl be like bragging winning a high shcool basketball championship but getting destroyed in the NBA, imho
|
The discussion is about Nintendo being mainstream, taking away the strongest side of their market makes absolutely no sense.
Like I said, the equivalent would be asking if Playstation is mainstream and using Vita sales to support ur argument. Or asking if Apple is mainstream and using Apple TV to support ur argument. Or asking if Xbox is mainstream and using Xbox Music/Video to support ur argument.
In a discussion about a company or brands relevance, u can't exclude that company or brands strongest area, u cannot have a logical discussion that way.
The fact is that Nintendo will sell over 80 million units of hardware this generation along with something like 200+ million units of Nintendo-published software. They will have something like 6-7 individual games sell over 10 million, about a dozen individual games sell over 5 million, about 25 individual games sell over 2 million, over 50 individual games sell over 1 million.
If Nintendo isn't mainstream than that means Xbox isn't mainstream because Nintendo is likely to sell more hardware than Microsoft. If Nintendo isn't mainstream than neither are Activision, Ubisoft or Electronic Arts since Nintendo will likely sell a similar amount of software as those companies.