| Chazore said: Going to try aiming for 2560 x 1440 |
Why not 120Hz? Much better experience over higher resolution
| Chazore said: Going to try aiming for 2560 x 1440 |
Why not 120Hz? Much better experience over higher resolution
My resolutions are:
-Look for a job. Quickly.
-Do more healthy choices (jog 2 miles in the park, eat less junk food).
-Get more platinum trophies than this year.
-Complete my backlog.
Ruler said:
Why not 120Hz? Much better experience over higher resolution |
Who said I wasn't going to?.
I said to myself nearly 2 years ago that at some point in the future I was going to go with dual monitor gaming which can also tailor me two different monitor setups.
Also it's not all that great when you're up against a 30fps lock or if you're Nvidia and still haven't sorted out the idle usage error that they still haven't put word on when you go above 120hz: http://techreport.com/news/29294/nvidia-will-fix-excessive-gpu-idle-power-use-at-high-refresh-rates
Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2025 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.