But that's the issue with what you have at the end, you want order but I want freedom. Your order conflicts with my freedom and general desire for an open market where decisions can be made by all of us, your roder effectively calncels and strifles any choice I'd ever want to make ebcause it's taken out of my hands and placed in someone who buys and tells us what to buy instead, maybe you're used to that but I once was and I;d rather choose free choice and the open market, I've grown to find a lot more interesting titles from that one than the limited one.

I'm ok with the way it is, both don't need to be the same even if it conflicts with you. It's good to have variety when it comes to business in an industry. This scenario reminds me of Assassin's creed now where the templars want order but the Assassin's want freedom to do anything. 

Yeah but the Templars wanted to rule and actually killed Assassins while the Assassins just wanted their freedom =P.

Like buying an IP like I said can restrict who gets to see or play it which can kill a good portion of your potential audience (Helldivers like I said int he article was off my radar because it was announced as being exclusive to a system I wasn't going to buy and of course the same goes towards some users here who voice the same for PC exclusives even though PC gets exclusives for totally different and more fair reasons than when it comes to consoles).

In the end I don't mind that you like quality control for certain things, I do sometimes myself for certain games.

Really cool. The game looked like a lot of fun and I don't have a Sony system. I don't care about what this means for console wars... let's be real here, it's not like they're putting Uncharted 4 on Steam or something.