By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chazore said:
veritaz said:
 


An open market is fine but it has its drawbacks too. The more open something is the more drawbacks it takes. The quality control issue is a big problem and I'd rather have big developers making the games instead of mostly smaller ones randomly doing things to see if it works out. An open market just doesn't have as much order as I would like.

But that's the issue with what you have at the end, you want order but I want freedom. Your order conflicts with my freedom and general desire for an open market where decisions can be made by all of us, your roder effectively calncels and strifles any choice I'd ever want to make ebcause it's taken out of my hands and placed in someone who buys and tells us what to buy instead, maybe you're used to that but I once was and I;d rather choose free choice and the open market, I've grown to find a lot more interesting titles from that one than the limited one.

I'm ok with the way it is, both don't need to be the same even if it conflicts with you. It's good to have variety when it comes to business in an industry. This scenario reminds me of Assassin's creed now where the templars want order but the Assassin's want freedom to do anything.