By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft - AngryJoe reviews Halo 5

foodfather said:
You mean to say ''AngryJoe acts like a little bitch for 30 minutes to get views''....

People like that shouldn't get to review games like Halo. He plays like shit. Painful to watch.

Joe in a nutshell

I preferred him back in his 360 days when he legit cared and wasn't all about the money. Also hilarous how we're getting these Angry reviews centered around bad scores for a specific platform or two.



Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.

Around the Network

It took me 8 hours to beat and halo games aren't usually that long anyways :P



ClassicGamingWizzz said:
Chazore said:
foodfather said:
You mean to say ''AngryJoe acts like a little bitch for 30 minutes to get views''....

People like that shouldn't get to review games like Halo. He plays like shit. Painful to watch.

Joe in a nutshell

I preferred him back in his 360 days when he legit cared and wasn't all about the money. Also hilarous how we're getting these Angry reviews centered around bad scores for a specific platform or two.

What do you mean by this?

As far as I know I think he means the order 1886 and how much hate it got or sony exclusive in general that is really a problem.



Chazore said:
foodfather said:
You mean to say ''AngryJoe acts like a little bitch for 30 minutes to get views''....

People like that shouldn't get to review games like Halo. He plays like shit. Painful to watch.

Joe in a nutshell

I preferred him back in his 360 days when he legit cared and wasn't all about the money. Also hilarous how we're getting these Angry reviews centered around bad scores for a specific platform or two.

so you preffered him more back in the days where he was mainly paid from microsoft?



Sprash said:

so you preffered him more back in the days where he was mainly paid from microsoft?


lol, I've watched him all the way back then. He was a completele and tuter nobdoy that even MS didn't know so no he wasn't paid by MS, he just loved XBox 360 a lot, last gen that was the go to system like how PS4 is apparently now. Nothing wrong with his old preferences from back then, mind you he mains PC now anyway so he's more or less stopped with switching between gens.

I'd rather he not get paid by anyone tbh, not even Sony, or you know Pewdiepie, oh wait.



Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.

Around the Network
foodfather said:
You mean to say ''AngryJoe acts like a little bitch for 30 minutes to get views''....

People like that shouldn't get to review games like Halo. He plays like shit. Painful to watch.


I agree that Angry Joe is excessive in his bitching, but sometimes you gotta shout to be heard.

He's right about split screen and the short unsatisfying campaign. I mean some games have suich high expectations, the halo's, the uncharteds, the gears. If they generally don't meet them, you gotta let the developer know



Whats the score, I cant see it



Predicted 15+ million lifetime-sales for God of War:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=234612&page=1

He also gave that new batman game a 6/10 if memory serves me correctly. He seems mad about the req system, but it isn't p2w in anyway. You still have to wait until charge is up. Either way the game has an 86 on metacritic which is better than most games now days and of course it will be the highest selling exclusive game this generation so far.



6 is a good score. Most things in life are OK or good. OK and good can be enjoyable. That goes for games for movies, music and almost everything else.

For some reason, the only audience that cries and whines when a reviewer gives out a 6, are gamers. You want every game to be over 80 on meta or else, the reviewers are biased.

A new mentality towards reviews need to be injected in the gaming community, do you have any idea how childish it is to get so worked up over 6/10, that's a good score, ANYTHING rated 6 or even 5 in any other entertainment medium is worth checking out. But gamers feel entitled to higher scores and it just screams immaturity.



Chazore said:
Sprash said:
 

so you preffered him more back in the days where he was mainly paid from microsoft?


lol, I've watched him all the way back then. He was a completele and tuter nobdoy that even MS didn't know so no he wasn't paid by MS, he just loved XBox 360 a lot, last gen that was the go to system like how PS4 is apparently now. Nothing wrong with his old preferences from back then, mind you he mains PC now anyway so he's more or less stopped with switching between gens.

I'd rather he not get paid by anyone tbh, not even Sony, or you know Pewdiepie, oh wait.

How do you know he gets paid for his reviews?

and if you know it can I ask how much? and from whom he gets his money?