I actually lost interest in purchasing this game over the past few weeks. Maybe its my financial situation.
I actually lost interest in purchasing this game over the past few weeks. Maybe its my financial situation.
The sad thing is, this game would have been good, if practically any other developer made it.
The standard game in Australia is $79. The Emote Edition is $99. That is $20 for two emotes. If anyone buys this edition they are fucking stupid.
The Ultimate edition in Australia is $160. Fuck that.
Oh that's right, according to EA, they put the player first now.
In all seriousness though. $20 for two emotes is pretty kickass bro.
| generic-user-1 said: it was EAs plan all along to creat anger, because anger leads to the dark side, and well thats EAs side. |
You made me laugh a lot! haha
OT: I was pretty excited for this game and I even liked the beta unlike most people, but when I realized that this game is charged at 300brl instead of the usual 200brl I decided to wait, and now this... an extremely expensive season pass. Yeah, I'm gonna wait until the price is fair.
Bet with Teeqoz for 2 weeks of avatar and sig control that Super Mario Odyssey would ship more than 7m on its first 2 months. The game shipped 9.07m, so I won

The only way this will change is if people don't buy it. Vote with your wallets people.
Switch Code: SW-7377-9189-3397 -- Nintendo Network ID: theRepublic -- Steam ID: theRepublic
Now Playing
Switch - Super Mario Maker 2 (2019)
3DS - Phoenix Wright: Ace Attorney (Trilogy) (2005/2014)
Mobile - Yugioh Duel Links (2017)
Mobile - Super Mario Run (2017)
PC - Borderlands 2 (2012)
PC - Deep Rock Galactic (2020)
| theRepublic said: The only way this will change is if people don't buy it. Vote with your wallets people. |
I definitely won't be buying it. I agree with you. It is a pity that so many mindless sheep will pick this up. If there were to be more smart customers, EA would no longer exist, or at least they would be a completely different company to what they are now.
I cant help but laughin out loud. His facial expressions are just epic funny! But yea, EA is a dick.
My Bravely Default CE is for sale, check it out: http://www.ebay.com/itm/Bravely-Default-Collectors-Edition-Nintendo-3DS-2014-/221490881912?pt=Video_Games_Games&hash=item3391e2a578
| Toxy said: EA is truly a plague on the industry. Star Wars Battlefront would be such a good game in the hands of a different developer. It is hard to think of a time when EA was not the awful company that they have been since the HD era. Hell even their Sims games have been reduced to EA's money scams. |
yeah its sad but true. their tactics are horrible. and they effect the industry A LOT. its really sad how the gaming industry is being monotized so heavily.

I'm trading my game in on day of purchase. I'm hoping to get Fallout4 or Just Cause 3 instead. Was really looking forward to this and then I realised how unsure I was having played the beta, and then the season pass killed it off for me.
The biggest problem here will be a lot of the Battlefield and COD players who are used to spending £110 on game and season pass that will probably end up in millions supporting this game. I really hope they don't.
This is what happens when you let a pub control a very popular and beloved franchise, they will cash it all in for as long as they can and as long as they are allowed to then they will forevermore. The game is probably going to sell a lot and the plat with the marketing rights is most likely going to be at the center shift for the blame because the more poeple that buy into this and claim "it's fine and perfectly acceptable" then they will like Joe states be a "harm" to the industry itself, the more people that think it's perfectly fine to shell out more money for less content and less quality the more you let your standards sink to rock bottom.
When they first revealed Battlefront I was very skeptical about how it would turn out and then of course fans started to create a checklist of what was missing from this game that the other two had in terms of content, of course over that peroid of time you had the mighty defenders of a game that at the time hardly showed next to any gameplay and in the typical fashion defended a publisher known for ripping their game sinto pieces and selling for more and were willing to go against facts rounded up from emre observation, you know that thing scientists and others do in various other fields, you observe and compare results, it;s not rocket science to conclude that BF has a lot less constant than the other two and being sold at a way higher price is actually worse for value than the two we had before. Simply put there is no "oh they are doing it from scratch let them have this one", no you see doing it from scratch would mean remaking "all" the content from the previous two games and making them in their own image for the upcoming one, not scrapping tons of previous content and not throwing anything in to replace it, that actually means we have less content than what we originally started with, that's total bullshit and I don't see why we should ever defend such a practice.
In the end with this and the original reveal and having played the Beta (which runs extremely well at ultra settings on my setup btw than GTA "optimized" V) I really don't feel it;s remotely worth the asking price, this was more or less the same stance I took with Battlefield 3 and Titanfall and I simply waited until those two were roughly £10 for the base game and int he case for TF the DLC came free with it with the only downside being less players because that's how MP only games are these days, short little vacations from one to the other that don't last nearly as long as say TF2 and CS.
Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.