By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Mafia Round 71 - Game Thread - Metal Gear - Mafia Wins!

Tagged games:

theprof00 on 13 October 2015
zero129 said:
Conegamer said:
In a way I understand the logic behind the Bella kill (Trucks having no mercy, but that does seem a bit harsh) and the SuperMario one (perhaps his style was frustrating the Mafia and they didn't want him to pry further?), but the Ganondorf kill makes little sense. Why him? What makes him a target? He has a subtotal of one post:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=7556675

And one word is hardly enough for Mafia to just "randomly kill". Seems very suspect, if you ask me.

The only thing i can gain from that as to why the mafia might of targeted him is his reply to that post.

Like trucks posts saying "you can read about your roles here"

And then Ganondorf replys with "Thanks".

just maybe a mafia player picked up on this as him having a Role and with him being new seen him as an easy target to take a chance on.

That's very astute of you zero. 
Can I ask when you thought of him possibly having a role?



Around the Network
theprof00 on 13 October 2015

xander, cone, platina
Those 3 are on my radar specifically for focusing on the sheer number of kills last night.
One of them is a vig, one is sk, one is mafia.
I'm sure of it.



theprof00 on 13 October 2015
axumblade said:
Well that sucks (sorry for the late entry. My computer is acting up so the site is a pain to navigate via mobile sometimes).

Also, Xander, I hope to god that wasn't supposed to be a reveal. X.x we've lost enough people day one. We don't need another modkiled x.x

We don't actually know that anyone was modkilled, and I would suspect that Trucks would have said something, because if he didn't, he would be breaking one of the cardinal rules of mafia hosting which is don't interfere in the game in a way that would create confusion.

Second of all, posting his name isn't anything special that would get him taken out by trucks.



theprof00 on 13 October 2015

The mario kill seems just so weird to me.
He pointed fingers at both myself and spurge.

To me, spurge seems like a townie. I defended him on day 1, preventing his lynch by mario, and even saying I leaned town on him.
A scum spurge would have taken my defense of him as a security blanket, and would try and make friends with me so that I could continue to defend him. But instead, he's fingered me as scum. I would say that is a town spurge move.

Myself, I am town.

So what that tells me is that someone killed mario, a guy who pointed fingers day 1 at two townies. In my mind, this would lead me to believe that someone wants it to look like supermario was on the right path, so that we would lynch spurge or myself today, and take the focus off of others.

Although, like I said, mario seems like the only one that would be killed by a possible vigilante. Unless there are two serial killers, which is unlikely.



theprof00 on 13 October 2015
zero129 said:
theprof00 said:

Cone, you said that you had an idea of why I was asking if people were male or female. What is your theory?

This is just a guess but maybe so he can figure out roles??

anyway indeed it is a very good question and i also would like to know whats his theory

Anyway, I suspect outlaw and cone. I don't like how both of them put a townie-slant on what a suspicious townie should have taken as digging for role info.

That brings my suspect pool to:
outlaw: 2 (mentioned both number of kills and assumed I was town)
cone: 2 (same as above)
platina: 1 (mentioned number of kills)
xander: 1 (mentioned number of kills)


I'm going to put my vote again for the person I think is the best lynch.

vote: conegamer



Around the Network
theprof00 on 13 October 2015

Also outlaw.
3 strikes.
1Not paying attention (more than one person voted yesterday, and he thinks only one person did)
2 mentioned number of deaths
3 assumed town motivation for my question yesterday

EBWOP:
Axum has only one strike, not two. For mentioning the number of kills.



Clyde32 on 13 October 2015
theprof00 said:
2 mentioned number of deaths


This one I didn't really think about at first. However the reactions do seem a bit overblown from the people who did mention them. I'm going to wait a bit longer before casting my vote though. 



theprof00 on 13 October 2015
Clyde32 said:
theprof00 said:
2 mentioned number of deaths


This one I didn't really think about at first. However the reactions do seem a bit overblown from the people who did mention them. I'm going to wait a bit longer before casting my vote though. 

My theory is this.
Each one had a kill, but didn't realize how many kills there would be during the night.
A serial killer might think "Ok, so there's the mafia and myself, I just have to avoid attention from them", and then be surprised that there is indeed another killer on the loose.
A vig might think the same
And so would the mafia. 
All vice versa, of course.



outlawauron on 13 October 2015
theprof00 said:
Also outlaw.
3 strikes.
1Not paying attention (more than one person voted yesterday, and he thinks only one person did)
2 mentioned number of deaths
3 assumed town motivation for my question yesterday
EBWOP:
Axum has only one strike, not two. For mentioning the number of kills.

Nothing in my post implies town motivation, just that you want to trap people.

Mentioning # of deaths isn't an indication of anything. If mentioning facts is a cause of suspicision, then you're probably gonna fuck this game like you did the last game I was in with you.

and yes, I did completely ignore your vote. My bad. Just scrolled to the bottom after day 2 started.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

Clyde32 on 13 October 2015
theprof00 said:
Clyde32 said:


This one I didn't really think about at first. However the reactions do seem a bit overblown from the people who did mention them. I'm going to wait a bit longer before casting my vote though. 

My theory is this.
Each one had a kill, but didn't realize how many kills there would be during the night.
A serial killer might think "Ok, so there's the mafia and myself, I just have to avoid attention from them", and then be surprised that there is indeed another killer on the loose.
A vig might think the same
And so would the mafia. 
All vice versa, of course.


Actually I think the reaction is more akin to a mafia. When you are a mafia you expect there to be one kill. If you were a serial killer or a vig you would know that there would be the person you killed as well as the person the mafia killed. One more kill might be a surprise, but not enough for that kind of reaction.