Whoever though it would be a good idea to use the gamepad to aim with, and seeing things from inside the cockpit, requireing double rendering of the intire game.... was a moron.

Wii U games arnt supposed to barely look better than gamecube games. Its bad design choices, imo.

Well, yes I know that. Final Fantasy XV uses its own engine, Luminous, and it looks great. Please don't call people stupid just because you don't understand it. I have my thoughts and you have yours. Can you tell me which game is which without looking it up?

I mean, if I didn't play games, I wouldn't know either. They look so similar it isn't funny.

Compared to... I dunno...

or even:

Yeah, that's kind of a cheap shot but you get what I'm saying? If not, that's okay because you formed your own opinions as have I. Have a good day.

Imagine if the rest of the developers start making this excuse.

Santa Monica Studios: God of War looks like a Ps2 game now because its cooler than those ugly realistic graphics yall!

IMO: Thats just a cheap excuse for a cash grab low budget game selling at 60$. At the end of the day, Knights will defend this graphics saying that the almighty Miyamoto is right.

Thats why i dont have any hope on the NX, much less it being a graphics powerhouse. Whats the point of the console having the best specs when the lead developer of Nintendo diss "realistic" graphics aka high budget, technically impressive graphics?

All i can do is smdh like almost every single PR from Nintendo.

I'd prefer 60fps rather than 30fps with a really nice looking game..

No, It wasn't a moron. Miyamoto may be many things, but definitely not a moron. I'd like to play the game first to judge myself if it was a bad design choice or not.  

Seeing as how varied this reality is, that point is moot. Crysis aims for realism, as does The Order: 1886, and they don't look at all alike.

Most people are going to be looking at the GamePad, given how the mechanic is shown and how many people look at the GamePad at events.

I much prefer the nostalgic visuals with the flawless 60fps performance. A game like Starfox needs lightening reflexes, and having higher detailed graphics but inconsistent framerates would detract from the experience. I think the graphics look fine, and are befitting to the game.

First things first, I never called anyone stupid. I said the claim that all realistic games look the same is stupid. Big difference.

I haven't played any of the games above, so I can't talk about them. However they all seem to be from the same genre of gaming, namely action adventure. Makes sense that they would look similar no? However, the statement the devs gave was about realism in general. Literally all genres.

Unless you think that any of these games look similar, I would stop listening to a dev that loves to generalize the competition to make his game look better by comparison

http://static1.gamespot.com/uploads/original/280/2802776/2927065-5117154758-20428.jpg" border="0">

http://i.imgur.com/mBtqGsN.jpg" border="0">

http://cdn2-b.examiner.com/sites/default/files/styles/image_content_width/hash/c7/65/c7656c28c68379a6afbd8721e9a1be60.jpg?itok=jP_c0Opk" border="0">

https://psmedia.playstation.com/is/image/psmedia/horizon-zero-dawn-screen-01-us-15jun15?$MediaCarousel_Original$" border="0">

I don't care what the graphics look like, just give me loads of enemies on-screen to shoot down.