It looks very generic in how modern it is. On the other hand, it doesn't look too bad and the old one was showing its age. I suppose the new one is more stylish but distances Google from people.
Hmm? | |||
Good | 33 | 45.21% | |
Bad | 25 | 34.25% | |
This is a sales website you dweeb. | 15 | 20.55% | |
Total: | 73 |
It looks very generic in how modern it is. On the other hand, it doesn't look too bad and the old one was showing its age. I suppose the new one is more stylish but distances Google from people.
It amazes me that a slight change from a serif font to a sans serif font can be (a) considered a logo change and (b) can actually generate discussion.
Now that I've gotten used to it, I think I prefer the older one. It just felt more classy than this logo.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.