And you do know whne you read a review, you read more than just the end right ? Or maybe you have trouble to read through the whole review . Just looking at the score is as stupid as just looking at the conclusion, they also highlighted some worrying flaws that could kill the game, it's not just about opinion, but it seems these flaws are not as big for everyone.

GTA IV, a very flawed game, had extremely positive reception from gaming critics. Wait until you played the game before saying it has or hasn't got any flaws. Even the best games have flaws anyway. What is a flaw to one person can also be a good thing for someone else. It's called an opinion.

GTA IV is a boring game so yes. ( and a lot of reviews were bored and said it was the msot boring GTA, bad thing after San Andreas , realism killed the fun )

No, it's not called opinion when a game is called boring and repetitive, it cant be good for an other person, but it can be small compared to all the quality of the games, but in this review, the flaws have a big place , more than the qualities of the game.

Anyway i was going to buy it because it would still be a good game no matter the flaws, was just wondering if it would be a masterpiece or not, most reviews say it is , so there is a good chance it is

So boring according to those reviews that it has 98% on metacritic. Yeah no, you're not going to make up stuff here on my watch.

Only you can ultimately decide whether a game will be a masterpiece to you, that's my point, and you know I'm right. If this review gave the game a 5 or 6 out of ten then I could understand your reaction. This was just a critical review of the game, he went over the flaws and good points and ultimately called it a good game and thus gave it a good score. I rather have a critical review than a review that's nothing but praise...

I still think we should all boycott this game.

I guess this unknown review proved to be fake lol

No other publication give the game less than 9 yet.

Like i said, it's not fake, it's just one of the worst french magazine/site with gameblog.fr .

It's Jeuxvideomagazine.com's rating scale which is way off. Anything below 13 is pretty much mediocre, and must be really bad to get below 10. It's one of the reasons why I really dislike the magazine (the other being they seem to hate the Wii U and constantly belittle it (just for scale, they rated Nintendos 2014 E3 digital event as by far the worst of all presentations), and the fact that they survived and Joypad didn't)