Kelzus said:
Every MGS game he has made has been financially successful. Who's to say the delays were needless? Konami don't seem to give much of a shit about console games anymore and to them maybe a "needless" delay is actually what it takes to make the game good. Millions of people buy these games because they are amazing, and that takes a lot of time, money and effort to create and I think that Konami just aren't interested in this business anymore because it's very risky. Why fund an expensive console game that may not sell well and not make any profit when you can make 50 piece of crap mobile games that probably will? However if MGS V doesn't make a nice profit I will be very suprised.
|
Konami, who is paying for those delays, is who's to say. There's a reason Konami doesn't care about console games anymore. Guess what it is: M.O.N.E.Y. If Konami was making enough money, they would still be focused on consoles. They aren't because they aren't. That means that, even with the almighty Kojima and MGSV, they don't expect to make enough money for continued business in that space to be worth it.
Clearly, those millions aren't enough. Clearly, the money it costs to develop an MGS game and the time and recources it takes isn't offseting the return when it's finally released enough. If it was, Konami wouldn't have fired Kojima and we wouldn't be having this conversation.
It's not just risky - it's not profitable enough. It's not worth it. The successes like MGS are not successful enough.
So yeah, why fund an expensive console game that, even if it sells well will never sell enough to be worth the initial investment when you can make 50 piece of crap mobile games that will? That's what Konami probably asked Kojima as they fired him.
Don't know why every story needs a good guy and a bad buy. This was, from the beginning, a grey issue.