It is a playstation exclusive, and the ps3 version is avalaible only on Japan, so it counts as a Ps4 exclusive everywhere else ;)

Untrue.

And as the link shows, it was a retail release on PS3 as well, so we can't even put it in "well, it's a PS4 retail exclusive" camp either.

Nobody knows about the ps3 version in the west then, metacritic doesn´t even count it

So a playstation exclusive on ps3 and ps4 like... uncharted, the last of us, GoW 3, but an exclusive at the end of the day.

Wrong, its not an exclusive to one platform like devil third, deal with it

People should stop abusing thé word exclusive 

It is a playstation exclusive you like it or not, and the ps3 version is not even mentioned on the reviews.

I didnt see a thread saying that devil third is thé worst exclusive if thé year and a masterpiece of this shit, even with its bad quality, i think mods would have seen that as a troll

If you you wish.  But this swings back round to the point I made earlier in the thread where everybody has a different definition of "exclusive".  Long gone are the days where exclusive means being on only one platform, it seems.

Isn't this thread just asking if it's the worst exclusive of the year? I don't think anyone would really care since Devil's Third is in fact a poor game and that is the general consesus, even among Nintendo fans.

There's no point in getting defensive over plain shit.

Well it changed recently, when games starting to be on several platforms, people like him invented thé " constrictor/console exclusive "  to fit their agenda

But at thé end, a real exclusive will always be something existing only on one platform and nowhere else, by  définition

Devils Third