By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Nintendo Fans Need To Be More Realistic About Their Expectations Of Wii U/3DS

zippy said:
KingdomHeartsFan said:

Its Nintendo's fault the Wii U is selling bad, they came out with it now they have to support it or risk losing gamers trust.  Gamers aren't gonna think well the Wii U is selling like shit so its okay for you to cut the support early Nintendo.



Sums it up perfectly, as much as I love Nintendo, putting out your console to pasture when it hasn't even been out for 3 years does not make me want to rush out and buy an NX. What if NX stumbles out of the blocks? are Nintendo going to do the same thing as Wii U? I have spent hundreds of pounds supporting the console with games, and whilst it has been immense fun, I will not spend another penny with Nintendo if they are going to drop support when things don't go to plan.


oh come off it, Nintendo has supported the Wii U wayyyyyyyyyy more than, say, Sony has supported the Vita. the reality is that you guys are being to hard on Nintendo, you NOTICE the less amount of games because of the absense of third party supporty

 

Nintendo is very likely releasing more first party games on the Wii U count wise than Microsoft/Sony are on their systems, yet Nintendo gets all of this hate from fans with ignorance that the lack of 3rd party support is why things seem so staunch

also I don't like this whiny attitude, you have no idea what Nintendo might announce, for gods sake clearly Nintendo does not care THAT much about E3, they've been doing streaming events and not bothering much for years, just because they aren't making big announcements at the moment doesn't mean they won't come.

 also bear in mind how the early (way early) Zelda Wii U announcement has hurt them because it's been delayed so long. maybe they are just being careful to not announce things too early

bear in mind Nintendo is releasing some big games even this year (Star Fox, SPlatoon, Xenoblade) and that they do have some interesting IPs coming up in Devil's Third and the Fatal Frame sequel that they've helped develop

in terms of the Wii U people are not being realistic in the sense that Nintendo can't just blindly throw money into developing games for a system they will not make any returns/money from. I think they are trying their best and that a lot of other companies would have possibly abanoned the Wii U earlier on had they went through what Nintendo has in terms of sales success

again, look at the Vita-  Sony has not pushed any big games at all in the last year. people also need to bear in mind that Nintendo practically soley pushes both their handheld and home console. they've done a great job with the 3DS and a pretty good job in terms of quality titles with the Wii U, but you've got to keep in mind that Nintendo is constantly working on big titles for BOTH systems- unlike a Sony who is ignoring the Vita

I just think the fanbase should be fair. Nintendo has pushed out some of the highest ratest games of this generation as exclusives (obviously) for the Wii U and seems as if they aren't getting any credit for that now. Smash, Mario 3D World, Mario Kart 8, Splatoon, there have been quality titles

 it's weird because I thought in the past that Nintendo fans appreciated quality >>> quantity, but that does not seem to be the case anymore. or maybe its just the vocal 'fans' who we're hearing...



Around the Network
Hiku said:
Soundwave said:

I know everyone is raking Nintendo over the coals right now, but realistically how much can they be expected to support such a console? Did you really think those low sales weren't going to have a consequence down the line? 

They are supporting the Wii U well considering how big of a disaster it is. You can't realistically ask them to throw away games like the next "real" Animal Crossing, which could sell 4 million in Japan alone on the next-gen Nintendo handheld just so a small Nintendo fanbase on the Wii U can be happy and then watch it sell maybe 750k-1 million. That's just not good business.

There's something that's perhaps more important here than short term profits though. Some times you have to lose in order to start winning.
People are only looking at: what is more profitable now/short term = most logical course of action for Nintendo. I don't neccisarily agree, given the situation they are in.
The small fanbase they still have left will be very important for them going into their next generation console. Because if those people don't buy the NX early on, even if it potentially could be a great console, it'll never reach those heights if everyone, including the core base loyal fans that are still with them, take the wait and see approach to their next console. Then the same thing that happened with the WiiU could very well happen again, no matter how good the NX might be. People don't buy it because they're sceptical. Third parties see that no one wants to risk investing in it, so they take the same approach.

It's no doubt that they are in a very difficult situation right now. I don't think it would be the craziest business decision ever to try to make the fans at least a bit happier leading up to NX, with at least one or so new quality title announcement, after they went out and stated that they intend to continue supporting the WiiU. While Animal Crossing Party and Mario Tennis is indeed support, that's not exactly what people had in mind when they heard that.
I'll mention Sony as an example. When the PS3 was suffering due to their poor business decisions, they had to make a choice. Either let the consoel crash and burn, or spend a lot of money it would never earn them back, in order to make it an attractive console again, and regain consumer trust. They chose to go with the latter. And while they never got that money back, that decision is paying off for them now with the PS4.

Note that I'm not making a direct comparison of the situations here, and I'm not talking about Nintendo doing the same to save the WiiU. I'm simply showing this as an example of investing money for the future. Money that you won't neccisarily earn back now, but is still important for future relations with your customers.
Investing money in a quality game or two for the WiiU wouldn't cost nearly as much as what Sony spent to turn around the PS3. Especially if they did't bother making those weird titles that no one asked for, like Metroid Ball, Animal Crossing Party, and Zelda Four Swords 3, etc.
And in return, their loyal fans would at least feel a bit more at ease about supporting the next Nintendo console, even if it's doing badly. WiiU will only be 4 years old by the end of 2016 after all, so it's not like there's no compromise here, seeing as that's not the standard life cycle of a console. Also, there were basically no must have games for the WiiU during the first year, so what we have here right now is only two years of support with quality titles for the system.

I'd prefer if they made something like a proper F-Zero rather than those titles showed us instead. Even if it won't make them as much money as it would on NX, or evebn if they'd lose some money. It may be very important for them to keep their current fanbase happy, going into NX.

you're off base

the Wii U didn't sell badly because Nintendo no longer has a fan base- a huge amount of the world has great memories of Nintendo games and has relatively positive thoughts on the company- look how many people own 3DS's, its obvious the fanbase hasn't disappeared

   the reality is that the Wii U was marketed terribly in terms of its connection with the Wii (or lackof), the use of the controller/gamepad, and generally 'why' people should buy it

    I don't think Nintendo should be afraid of losing potential buyers by transitioning to their next console in the next year or 2, it's the only natural thing to do considering its sales.

  Iwata has already expressed that there are lots of projects for the Wii U still being developed and that obviously Nintendo still is going to be putting out plenty of software. people are jumping the gun too early with this E3 stuff, Nintendo just does not care much for E3 and is not really more likely to release big information at E3 than other points in the year

   regardless, the Wii U failed to grab a lot of Nintendo's fanbase that have went for the 3DS or just opted for a different system. a casual gamer is not going to jump on the touchscreen gamepad, it just wasn't realistic

   Nintendo will be fine with the NX as long as its a straight forward system and is advertised well. especially if they really do integrate connection between NX home console and handheld there should be nothing stopping it considering how large Nintendo's handheld fanbase is

people need to stop freaking out and whining, its hilarious you all acting as if Nintendo will lose their fanbase if they drop the Wii U early when most of the highest ratest games so far this generation have been on the Wii U and 1st party Nintendo titles



How did those good business decisions work out for SEGA soundwave? They are backing themselves into a corner. 

Your logic completely ignores future sales of said platforms and how they will be affected. If the NX is a home console, it will end like the dreamcast, and what then? Rush yet another system hoping things get better? That isnt a viable srategy.

When buying a system, customers put their faith on the system creators to make the investment worth it. If it isnt they wont make the same mistake next time. Do you think Sony has any chance of releasing a sucessful portabLe after the Vita? They wont even atempt such foolishness. Nintendo is heading in the same direction now. If you dont support your system, customers wont support you, its that simple. NX is already doomed.

I dont know who is complaining about the 3DS though. Its seen alot of support. Its the Wii U that is a problem.



nintendo should change some things. we need more ports, and we need more indies.
nintendo should take away some of the risk from 3rd partys. if the 3rd partys dont have to pay for the first 200k copys, wells that would make em more willing to port, because they could make save cash even if the wiiu port ust sales 250k. and nintendo needs atleast some ports.



Werix357 said:
Soundwave said:
Nuvendil said:
I think it's less of a "we could sell more on x platform" and more raw numbers concerning what money Nintendo can spend and remain profitable. Nintendo clearly underestimated the money needed for HD development and with pressure from the shareholders to hit profits no matter what, Nintendo's budgets can only be so high. Smash had tons of cash tied up till end of hear last year. Same with MK8. XCX, Zelda, and SMTxFE have big budgets as well. If the Wii U had more sales and some kind of third party support, Nintendo could be more liberal with spending. I think this whole gen has suffered from this initial poor planning and lack of understanding of what they were getting into.


Well that's the other thing. They can't just be making like a high budget Metroid game just to make the very small Wii U userbase happy when development costs are so much higher today.

It's just not a realistic expectation. 

The moment we saw sustained poor Wii U sales, people really should have known that there was going to be a real consequence to that down the line. 

Expecting the Wii U to have the same level of support from Nintendo as say the Wii did is just not realistic. Especially when the games cost more to develop. 

But I do think they have to allocate their big IP carefully too. An Animal Crossing game takes 3 years on average to make, if they just "waste" one on the Wii U, that means the NX won't get an Animal Crossing likely until mid-cycle, which is probably not something Nintendo deems suitable. 

You both hit the nail on the head. Nintendo now realize that HD development takes more time and are most likely starting development on games for their next console/s so they don't have a repeat of the Wii U and 3DS launch's. Oh and going with common hardware and good development tools for their next system/s is a given if they want 3rd party support.

i think good development tools - this is required. and Nintendo should listen to 3rd party support (mostly Western devs). As this impacts there isn't any games outside Nintendo wanted to release.  Since HD takes time, surely they need a ton of developer studios to create games but end of the day, they would be limited and pushing AAA new IPs to success is really difficult. 

Nintendo need 3rd party support on their next console, if they can pull the crossover games and fund a few 3rd party developed games they should be able to. Imagine no football game for WiiU, Konami has PES, why not NIntendo try to collaborate with Konami to have a PES WiiU version.  It would sell in Japan.  It will attract the western WiiU owners as well.  But Nintendo being Nintendo. They should admit that 3rd party developers need the SDKs that can easily port PS4, X1 games to WiiU.  but there are other technical specs that need to consider which would always look the WiiU version the inferior one and sales would be bad.  

Nintendo come on, you need to wake up.  Support the Wii U on a 5-year plan like other consoles but provide more game variety while supporting it.  Nobody would buy your new console if you couldn't support properly the Wii U. 

I'm cool with my current Wii U game library, it is those single console owners that would really be pissed on droughts and too many meh games in between AAA and AA games. 



Around the Network

I wonder what happened to johnlucas.. his UNITY thread was pure gold xD



Nem said:

How did those good business decisions work out for SEGA soundwave? They are backing themselves into a corner. 

Your logic completely ignores future sales of said platforms and how they will be affected. If the NX is a home console, it will end like the dreamcast, and what then? Rush yet another system hoping things get better? That isnt a viable srategy.

When buying a system, customers put their faith on the system creators to make the investment worth it. If it isnt they wont make the same mistake next time. Do you think Sony has any chance of releasing a sucessful portabLe after the Vita? They wont even atempt such foolishness. Nintendo is heading in the same direction now. If you dont support your system, customers wont support you, its that simple. NX is already doomed.

I dont know who is complaining about the 3DS though. Its seen alot of support. Its the Wii U that is a problem.

The SEGA analogy again does not work. Sega released the 32X and 8 months later surprise released the Saturn with no marketing in the US. They failed to support both. 

Nintendo hasn't done that, they have supported the Wii U quite well, they just lost the casual/soccer mom demographic entirely and basically found themselves with a system that no one but Nintendo fans wanted. The Wii U is more like the original XBox which was supported by MS for 4 years than either the 32X or Saturn. 

If NX fails, then Nintendo is probably done with hardware and will become a third party. But the NX can fail just as easily if Nintendo is preoccupied supporting the failing Wii U and launches the NX slowly. 

The longer the Wii U stays on the market, likely the more damage is being done to Nintendo's brand. 



I'm pretty sure Wii U will be replaced until 2018, six years after launch, like the Wii. Sales doesn't matter. Just a random cycle.



Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever

Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe

DKCTF didn't move consoles

Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor

Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile


Yup. Time to move on. Winter 2016, baby.



Soundwave said:
Nem said:

How did those good business decisions work out for SEGA soundwave? They are backing themselves into a corner. 

Your logic completely ignores future sales of said platforms and how they will be affected. If the NX is a home console, it will end like the dreamcast, and what then? Rush yet another system hoping things get better? That isnt a viable srategy.

When buying a system, customers put their faith on the system creators to make the investment worth it. If it isnt they wont make the same mistake next time. Do you think Sony has any chance of releasing a sucessful portabLe after the Vita? They wont even atempt such foolishness. Nintendo is heading in the same direction now. If you dont support your system, customers wont support you, its that simple. NX is already doomed.

I dont know who is complaining about the 3DS though. Its seen alot of support. Its the Wii U that is a problem.

The SEGA analogy again does not work. Sega released the 32X and 8 months later surprise released the Saturn with no marketing in the US. They failed to support both. 

Nintendo hasn't done that, they have supported the Wii U quite well, they just lost the casual/soccer mom demographic entirely and basically found themselves with a system that no one but Nintendo fans wanted. The Wii U is more like the original XBox which was supported by MS for 4 years than either the 32X or Saturn. 

If NX fails, then Nintendo is probably done with hardware and will become a third party. But the NX can fail just as easily if Nintendo is preoccupied supporting the failing Wii U and launches the NX slowly. 

The longer the Wii U stays on the market, likely the more damage is being done to Nintendo's brand. 


Lets not act like this is the first failure system Nintendo had. But with the GC they supported it to the last (also with pretty agressive price cuts). That has not been the case with the Wii U.

You can see on this website how the core Nintendo fans are reacting to this situation. So, if they lose their core fans, who is going to buy the NX? It will potencially do worse than the Wii U unless it somehow manages to earn back some of the customers it lost.

I dont think that staying longer in the market with the Wii U would hurt them anymore. They would keep their core fanbase and the only other people who care are core gamers that are rooted on the rival consoles. The casual audience they lost doesnt go about reading internet forums and gaming news so they wouldnt know the difference. The only way to regain that audience is to go back to some simplistic gimmick anyways.

So, the question becomes: Who is Nintendo trying to get with this? Core fans will be pissed off, casual gamers will only come with a simplistic gimmick, core gamers from rival companies? I dont see who is asking for this nor who this is directed at. Either way, i dont see how it can work any better than the Wii U.

Only chance i see is the so called Fusion and trying to unify both markets because on the portable market they are still strong. Home console market is completely lost like this. Not even the 10m of the Wii U will come back.