When you understand how emulation works, these raw numbers take on a new meaning. 

So it's actually (for a simpleton like me) a hybrid solution of porting, but not porting, and emulation. A proper emulator will be able to play the game directly off the disc, which is what the PS3 with PS2 software emulation did when that replaced the PS3 with included emotion engine. This is of course not what Xb one can do.

So from what I've read MS has not been completely forthcoming with the details in that they have essentiall just said, "its a licencing issue" which is a half truth. This gives the technically illiterate, like me, the impression that if the game is not made available that's because the mean old rights holder is refusing to open up the licence to this form of b/c. While that may be true in some cases, as you've pointed out it is also true that it other cases it will be technically impossible to provide the game via this solution and the only option would be porting or a remaster, which MS is not going to do without wanting to recover some of the cost. It also means that in all cases there will be work to be done after the licencing issue has been sorted out, and that means time and cost (even if it's only a few hours), which means money, which means there are probably not going to be thousands of 360 games made available for playing on Xb one. Probably not even a majority.  Do you have a ballpark estimate for how long it would take to do the necessary modifications for one game?

Oh really..

Someone needs to go read up on dynarecs and dynamic binary translators before telling others about understanding emulation.

I don't think we should say "proper emulator" based on the ability whether the games can run off discs. The reason behind this isn't clear in any way but doesn't mean there is not an emulator at work.

I hope we will get more information so that many of the "concerns" can finally go away.

Not when, if. And if you do, you should be able to create better threads and posts.

It's negative because for God knows what reason it makes him feel insecure.

A large portion of the conversion would be done automatically, then it's simply a case of testing and tweaking configurations, the emulator will be setup to handle a range of potential solutions, such as redirecting edram addressing for AA and anisotropic functions to shaders, but with flagged switching for different titles to change what hooks to enable and disable, for example if a title was using parts of the hardware for aa, you'd setup the emulators flag to hook those functions and pass them on, but if the software wasnt, you could use those resources for something else instead.

The argument of comparing peak ram speeds for self contained modules and ignoring the actual transfer rate between memory block and system bus is pretty much a dead end as far as discussion goes, but the problem is, op takes the "you must not understand" approach when he clearly doesn't comprehend why the figures and "facts" he is spouting aren't really relevant to the situation.

Concerns? it looks more like trolling to me.

*stares at op*

Yeah, yeah. 

You thought I had no idea about what I was talking about.

Someone needs to stop throwing their qualifications and technical jargon about. I see through your act. 

I think its more an emotional outburst of some kind rather than fact providing. Not sure what the agenda is here...