That last thing you said he believes may not be so far off. I don't know what go'vt but "I think" it "could" be a virus genetically engineered and tested on people and maybe spread too far to be contained. Whether it was directed at a specific race? Idk, could be but it just might "seem" like that because of africa.

About aids origin:

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9C0CEFDE133EF937A15754C0A966958260
(this one is still considered likely but was later found that the results of the test could not be duplicated...

http://www.avert.org/origins.htm
(go down to the "when?" section)

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9B0DEFD6173AF93BA15753C1A961948260&sec=health&pagewanted=all

http://www.uow.edu.au/arts/sts/bmartin/dissent/documents/AIDS/Cribb96.pdf

Why do you think aids was created by the government? Do you have any evidence?

HIV would be a pretty ineffective virus for military needs.  I can't see why the government would ever make a disease like it.

Gotta agree with Kasz, I mean let's think about it rationally. What possible reason could the government have to create a virus such as this? It doesn't make any sense, it has no use as far as military goes, and I can't foresee any other reason to make it.

I think it's quite sad that people make these accusations and impede real research.

Thanks for the links I'm reading the first one now and the rest later. I think that the soviets are giving the right explanation. As for why military use? It doesn't sound useful and really I don't know why people make things like mustard gas to hurt other people anyway. Maybe they wanted it to slowly kill soldiers or a very very slow assassination alternative. Maybe it's like I theorized, IDK. Thinking more on what the soviet said, saying it just "escaped" doesn't sit right with me but it's possible. To your last point. If it was done in a lab by some gov't do you really think you'd find real evidence about it doing research on the net? It's not like it can't be sanitized now like free news right?

The soviets made it up, trying to destabilize the west.

As for the blame? I wouldn't know who to believe and most likely wouldn't believe either side. I can see placing blame for t being used as tactic to demonize the side of your enemies like what your suggesting.

That pastor is a racist, and Obama is a fool for agreeing and following that racist scum.

And who knows, if that pastor has been like that all those 20 years ? Maybe he started with openly spouting shit just a year or so ago and before always had good speeches, that don't give his real views away. Or maybe he changed over time .. with time people can become bitter and hatred filled.

@ shio )

yea, openly distancing himself from that man makes him a follower *rolleyes* *sigh*