By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Bloodborne Review Thread - MetaCritic 93% ~ GameRankings 91.47%

estebxx said:
FentonCrackshell said:
Did so many of you really need meta scores to validate your wanting this game?

no, im currently playing and enjoying a game that has a 55 metascore more than what i have enjoyed some games with higher ratings.

i just want this game to get the awesome score that it deserves.


I hear ya! I want The Order and Bloodborne but I'm loving Dragon Age Inquisition too much to stop playing it right now. 



PC GAMING: BEST GAMES. WORST CONTROLS

A mouse & keyboard are made for sending email and typing internet badassery. Not for playing video games!!!

Around the Network

They added a new reviews and go up to 93 again.

93 from 39 reviews.



DrDoomz said:
To all those who think Bloodborne is amazing, pls take the time to go on Amazon and Metacritic and score it a 10/10 to offset the haters with an obvious agenda to lower the score of the game out of salty spite.

Giving 10/10 reviews to a game to offset haters giving 0/10 is just stooping down to their level, in my opinion.

The best course of action is writing an honest and complete review when you've had time to play through the game. Anyone who spent some time on Metacritic or Amazon knows one line reviews are worthless and that all exclusive are bound to be plagued by those extreme reviews (both positive and negative). The average user scores on these sites are useless but there are still good, honest and thorough reviews to be found and those are the ones people consider when making a purchase.



Signature goes here!

The 39th reviews was the 10/10 Guardian.



TruckOSaurus said:
DrDoomz said:
To all those who think Bloodborne is amazing, pls take the time to go on Amazon and Metacritic and score it a 10/10 to offset the haters with an obvious agenda to lower the score of the game out of salty spite.

Giving 10/10 reviews to a game to offset haters giving 0/10 is just stooping down to their level, in my opinion.

The best course of action is writing an honest and complete review when you've had time to play through the game. Anyone who spent some time on Metacritic or Amazon knows one line reviews are worthless and that all exclusive are bound to be plagued by those extreme reviews (both positive and negative). The average user scores on these sites are useless but there are still good, honest and thorough reviews to be found and those are the ones people consider when making a purchase.

Except the game does deserve a 10/10. 9/10 would be a minimum and by offsetting the 0/10's, it averages at about 9/10 with 1:10 ratio of positive vs queationable hater ratings. In the end it offsets and creates a fairer rating, don't you think?



Around the Network
DrDoomz said:
To all those who think Bloodborne is amazing, pls take the time to go on Amazon and Metacritic and score it a 10/10 to offset the haters with an obvious agenda to lower the score of the game out of salty spite.

There's a reason why Amazon implements the helpful rating in user reviews, but you can also report those 1 star reviews to see if Amazon removes them.



TruckOSaurus said:
DrDoomz said:
To all those who think Bloodborne is amazing, pls take the time to go on Amazon and Metacritic and score it a 10/10 to offset the haters with an obvious agenda to lower the score of the game out of salty spite.

Giving 10/10 reviews to a game to offset haters giving 0/10 is just stooping down to their level, in my opinion.

The best course of action is writing an honest and complete review when you've had time to play through the game. Anyone who spent some time on Metacritic or Amazon knows one line reviews are worthless and that all exclusive are bound to be plagued by those extreme reviews (both positive and negative). The average user scores on these sites are useless but there are still good, honest and thorough reviews to be found and those are the ones people consider when making a purchase.


It's so immature to me to be doing that (scoring 0s/10s for the sake of it). This console war is so stupid. It was fun during the Genesis/SNES days or even PS2/Xbox days but now with the consoles being so like each other it's time just to appreciate when we do get great exclusives like this.



DrDoomz said:
TruckOSaurus said:

Giving 10/10 reviews to a game to offset haters giving 0/10 is just stooping down to their level, in my opinion.

The best course of action is writing an honest and complete review when you've had time to play through the game. Anyone who spent some time on Metacritic or Amazon knows one line reviews are worthless and that all exclusive are bound to be plagued by those extreme reviews (both positive and negative). The average user scores on these sites are useless but there are still good, honest and thorough reviews to be found and those are the ones people consider when making a purchase.

Except the game does deserve a 10/10. 9/10 would be a minimum and by offsetting the 0/10's, it averages at about 9/10 with 1:10 ratio of positive vs queationable hater ratings. In the end it offsets and creates a fairer rating, don't you think?

The game doesn't "deserve" anything til you play it though.



FentonCrackshell said:
Did so many of you really need meta scores to validate your wanting this game?


No. Its just great to see a game you want doing well



FentonCrackshell said:
Did so many of you really need meta scores to validate your wanting this game?


Yes the game has to score as high and sell as much as possible for me to proof the gaming industry that High budget AAA games can be hardcore orientated.