By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Has Crytek entered a deal with Nintendo?

QUAKECore89 on 16 March 2015
Aielyn said:

I just saw some gaming news that I suspect connects up with a different bit of gaming news we learned of a while ago.

http://www.develop-online.net/news/crytek-signs-huge-licensing-deal-with-mystery-firm/0204382

"Crytek has signed a major licensing deal with a mystery firm as part of its strategy to put the company on a more stable footing following its troubles last year."

Crytek had had some financial troubles, which were resolved in 2014, through "securing of extra capital". This "extra capital" is directly connected to this news of a "huge licensing deal".

That's the newer piece of news. But when I read it, I couldn't help but recall another "mystery" from 2014, this time connected to Nintendo.

http://www.gonintendo.com/s/227800-nintendo-spends-100-million-on-mystery-acquisition

"@Nintendo spends over US$100m on mystery tech acquisition in 4Q, no word on what it is, QOL? new hardware related? unknown"

This news came out just a couple of months before Crytek confirmed that they had secured extra capital.

 

What if these two bits of information are connected? Crytek would certainly qualify as a "tech acquisition". Some further reasons for thinking there might be something to this...

1. Wii U is the first Nintendo platform with proper CryEngine support. Sonic Boom Rise of Lyric is a Wii U exclusive game made in CryEngine. Given that development had to have started noticeably after Wii U launch, it seems surprising that Wii U support would be incorporated for, at the time, just one, exclusive, game (and one that was developed in a Nintendo/Sega deal, so it's unlikely that it would have been considered for multiplatform release). But if Nintendo were in talks for some level of acquisition or special licensing deal? Much more plausible, then.

2. CryEngine is relatively unused compared to other notable engines such as Unreal or Unity. With Crytek going through financial issues, a major publisher forming a deal to use CryEngine in a lot of future games would be a huge boon for them. If that "major publisher" were a console creator with other publishers and developers also making games for their system, and were interested in attracting more support, it would open up Crytek to more opportunities.

Nintendo's deal regarding Unity is basically one of "Unity games will be easily built for Wii U". But if Nintendo entered a deal with Crytek, they could ensure not only Crytek titles being released on Nintendo systems, but also potentially bring over other CryEngine games.

Some interesting observations about other recent announcements...

Homefront: The Revolution, which was Crytek before it (and its studio) being bought by Deep Silver, is being developed on CryEngine. It's currently in development for Windows, Mac, PS4, XBO, and Linux... and has recently been delayed from 2015 to 2016. Suppose that wasn't so much due to development issues themselves, but due to addition of Wii U to the list of platforms?

Hunt: Horrors of the Gilded Age, in development by Crytek for Windows, PS4, and XBO, was set to have a beta at the end of 2014, before a last-minute announcement of a delay with no new date as of yet. Perhaps it, also, is being brought to Wii U?

 

Crytek pretty much fits everything we know about Nintendo's "mystery tech acquisition". Nintendo also fits, quite nicely, Crytek's "major licensing deal with a mystery firm". What do you think? Could they be referring to the same deal?


Wait, what?!



Around the Network
kinisking on 16 March 2015

ithink its ea. crytek has history with them



Ltd predictions by the time 9th Gen comes out

Ps4:110million

Xbox one :75 million( was 65) 

Wii u: 20 milliion

Mr Khan on 16 March 2015

It would really be of no worth to Nintendo. It would squander any value Crytek has to put them on Nintendo platforms, given that Nintendo is about economical use of console power.



Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.

Frogger on 16 March 2015

Nintendo already said that the purchase wasn't gaming related.



the_dengle on 16 March 2015

Well, your reasoning is sound. But Nintendo had an "acquisition" while Crytek has a "licensing deal." Wouldn't acquisition imply that Nintendo bought Crytek? That would be a terrible move for Crytek.

kinisking said:
ithink its ea. crytek has history with them

EA has Frostbite. What use would they have for Crytek?



Around the Network
Aielyn on 16 March 2015
Soundwave said:

Crytek is a Western studio ... so that'd be no. Nintendo doesn't make deals like this with Western companies anymore.

$100 mill is likely something related to the quality of life stuff, I'm not even sure if Crytek is worth $100 million dollars as a whole.

Nintendo have specifically said they needed to do more with western companies, not less. And when did Iwata become the CEO of Nintendo America? Right around the time that the first discussions with Crytek would have started, in this hypothesised situation.

As for how much Crytek would cost... your guess is as good as mine, but a $100 million deal could be a 10 year deal at $10 million per year, so it's not like it has to be anywhere near the value of the company itself.



Kerotan on 16 March 2015

For that money would they not be better off just buying them?



Aielyn on 16 March 2015
QUAKECore89 said:
Aielyn said:
Hunt: Horrors of the Gilded Age, in development by Crytek for Windows, PS4, and XBO, was set to have a beta at the end of 2014, before a last-minute announcement of a delay with no new date as of yet. Perhaps it, also, is being brought to Wii U?


Wait, what?!

What?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunt:_Horrors_of_the_Gilded_Age

Currently being developed by Crytek Frankfurt.

http://www.crytek.com/career/studios/overview/frankfurt



QUAKECore89 on 16 March 2015
Aielyn said:
QUAKECore89 said:
Aielyn said:
Hunt: Horrors of the Gilded Age, in development by Crytek for Windows, PS4, and XBO, was set to have a beta at the end of 2014, before a last-minute announcement of a delay with no new date as of yet. Perhaps it, also, is being brought to Wii U?


Wait, what?!

What?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hunt:_Horrors_of_the_Gilded_Age

Currently being developed by Crytek Frankfurt.

http://www.crytek.com/career/studios/overview/frankfurt

Since when - Hold on checking the date post...... Aww... I was on vacation last year. xD



Aielyn on 16 March 2015
the_dengle said:

Well, your reasoning is sound. But Nintendo had an "acquisition" while Crytek has a "licensing deal." Wouldn't acquisition imply that Nintendo bought Crytek? That would be a terrible move for Crytek.

They acquired "tech". Was it confirmed that they acquired a company?

Curiously, all of the news was about it being a "non-Japanese, non-games company". But what if the interpretation was slightly wrong? What if it was a non-"games company"? What if it wasn't a company? If the deal was for CryEngine, which is certainly non-Japanese and non-"games company", while being "tech", it would make sense. If they acquired some special CryEngine license, such as one that guaranteed that games developed with CryEngine would be published on Nintendo platforms, it could be worth $100 million.

I'm not saying it's guaranteed. But I could see it happening.