By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Rockstar should have charged for Heists!

 

Should have charged a small price?

YAY 5 9.43%
 
NAY 48 90.57%
 
Total:53

Nah, by making it free, it's easier to ignore any b*tching about it not working. Same with the original online mode. It's free so when it wasn't working well, it really couldn't have bothered old rocky that much.



Thanks jlmurph!

Around the Network
Captain_Yuri said:
TheGoldenBoy said:
Captain_Yuri said:

Free shit is free... Don't complain... And GTA has sold over 30 million copies... Even if they charged for it, they would have server problems cause people would still buy it and people would be even more pissed cause they paid for it

Over 45 million to be exact.

Exactly! Heck, this is probably why they delayed the PC version too cause just imagine these types of server problems + the PC gamers trying to do it as well! It would be soo much worse since its already like this:

Was that blood at the end of the gif?



With how long it took, they should have just marketed it as DLC from the beginning.



TheGoldenBoy said:
Captain_Yuri said:

Exactly! Heck, this is probably why they delayed the PC version too cause just imagine these types of server problems + the PC gamers trying to do it as well! It would be soo much worse since its already like this:

Was that blood at the end of the gif?

Loll yea. Its mostly used as a sex joke :P



                  

PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850

When you promise the consumer something for free, you give them that, regardless if it's 1 1/2 years later.



Around the Network

Nah, they're like Nolon Bushnell in the Atari days. They've got more money than they could piss it away. With GTA5 alone...they should have made a killing.



Captain_Yuri said:
TheGoldenBoy said:
Captain_Yuri said:

Exactly! Heck, this is probably why they delayed the PC version too cause just imagine these types of server problems + the PC gamers trying to do it as well! It would be soo much worse since its already like this:

Was that blood at the end of the gif?

Loll yea. Its mostly used as a sex joke :P

That's what I thought, especially with you posting it



MikeRox said:
Barkley said:
Rockstar have enough money I'm sure.


Doesn't their parent (Take 2) frequently bleed money?


Is Rockstar properly owned by them or just contracted? 



Chazore said:
There will always be server problems, the main issue is that they never ever plan and never expect that many people to play the game for a feature that was promised ages ago, forward planning for online games seems to be an almost dead concept, charging for it would put people off and others indefinitely, imagine if after nearly a 2 year delay they charge PC users full price for a port of an old game and then have the gall to charge for online in the PC realm, R* would get dropped like a hat in that space easily.


If they charged 2 dollars or even 5 a shit load of people would but it.  Sure millions rebought the game a few months ago.  And as I said it could be made free in 3 months.



Kerotan said:
MikeRox said:


Doesn't their parent (Take 2) frequently bleed money?


Is Rockstar properly owned by them or just contracted? 


Wholly owned. It is just a label really for their "Mature" content.



RIP Dad 25/11/51 - 13/12/13. You will be missed but never forgotten.