Hahahahahahahahahahaha

ahahahahahahaahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahaahah

ahahahahahahahahahahhaahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhaahahhaha

Were you born in north korea or something?

Whoa!  That's exactly what the OP said you said! 

This is like some weird meta thing, isn't it?

have you ever played a broken nintendo game? or one with not working controlls?or with Day one dlc that was clearly cut out of the game just to sell it as dlc? or one that missed features the advertised?

you dont have to like em, but you cant argue that nintento games are of low quality...

Not being broken doesnt = quality.

Having DLC doesnt mean it was cut out of the game. In most cases, the online content before DLC in most games is greater than that found in nintendo games anyway. Secondly, its still a better option than something like selling pokemon game variants at full prices when a capable developer could turn them into DLC packs, so you would only need 1 base game and could get the full experience (and in many cases, only the things you specifically want) at a lower cost.

Similar logic applies to promising content... Most other games feature so much more content than nintendo games that even when they fall short of their promises, they are still miles ahead of nintendo.

You dont have to like other games, but you cant argue they have been ahead in the vast majority of things for a very long time: physics, story, graphics, sound effects, cut-scenes and it means the gameplay is advancing at a faster rate than what nintendo have been offering customers.

The only thing I cant argue about is 'art style' because thats subjective, but even then, theres a far wider variety on PS4 than the wii U.

Not broken is a clear indicator for quality. 

and some dlc is cleary cut out of the game just to be sold as dlc.

and pokemon has 2 versions everytime because people should trade pokemons, its a social game. dlc couldnt do this.

Its ONE indicator of quality.

and some content is clearly cut out of a game just to be sold as another variant of a game.

lastly, thats a lame excuse. There are also social games on PS4 where you can trade items with other players.... most obvious example being FIFA ultimate team.

Glass houses and stuff.

Nintendo games have a ton of polish, but you're exagerrating.

Im sorry but your point is kinda invalid when you cherry pick two games out of many Sonic games that have been released. Sonic does more good than bad sales wise at least, so it has to be more than quality that caused those games to fail. Are you trying to say the crap games dont sell? cause that would be false unless you think the ones that did sell are actually good, then that is subjective and we would just be talking around each other.

Not quite sure what 3ds has to do with anything as i didnt mention it.

Matter of fact I would say the recent flops have just as much to do with the system they are on and the quality.

Metrold Other M had a glitch, Mario Kart 7 had a glitch, Skyward Sword had a game breaking bug. 

Here's the thing so what? You people are missing the point, it doesnt MATTER if Mario is bug less or not, if someone doesnt like Mario it wouldnt matter to them. If they like Assassin's creed then they will play AC because that is the only way they can play AC. Thats like telling someone hey this restaurant cooks better steak than that restaurant across the street that makes ok salad, guess what im a vegan I dont care about steak no matter how well its made

either there is something that Ninty is doing wrong or something consumers are doing wrong. The customer is mostly right so the wise bet would be the former