By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - An 1 world war FPS could bring a lot of new cool and brutal elements to Story and MP.

Ka-pi96 said:
Trench warfare sounds really boring. There's a reason most historical games focus on WWII rather than WWI...


Fictional story based on the historical settings of WW1, it doesn't have to be 100% correct. The tanks was invented back in WW1, the zeppelins, the Gas bombs etc etc. there is a lot of material there to create an alternative story of the WW1. I just wanna experience the trenches, the enviroments. etc as long as those things are real, it doesn't matter how the story goes when it comes to realism. they did actually have spies back then as well, and warfare outside of those trenches. The problems is that there is a lot of great stories during WW1, but it wasn't as recorded as the WW2 was, and therefore we don't hear as much about WW1 as we hear about WW2. it's do-able and with a good tweak on the plot it can turn out a good game with those amazing scenaries.



 

PSN: Opticstrike90
Steam: opticstrike90

Around the Network

Considering Paradox have not made a game dedicated to WW1, i can't see a AA/AAA FPS game about it anytime soon :P
OT: What Kapi said.



Ka-pi96 said:
Baryonyx said:
Ka-pi96 said:
Trench warfare sounds really boring. There's a reason most historical games focus on WWII rather than WWI...


Fictional story based on the historical settings of WW1, it doesn't have to be 100% correct. The tanks was invented back in WW1, the zeppelins, the Gas bombs etc etc. there is a lot of material there to create an alternative story of the WW1. I just wanna experience the trenches, the enviroments. etc as long as those things are real, it doesn't matter how the story goes when it comes to realism. they did actually have spies back then as well, and warfare outside of those trenches. The problems is that there is a lot of great stories during WW1, but it wasn't as recorded as the WW2 was, and therefore we don't hear as much about WW1 as we hear about WW2. it's do-able and with a good tweak on the plot it can turn out a good game with those amazing scenaries.

I agree it could potentially be interesting, although it would be much harder to make interesting than most other eras.. Personally I'd much rather a strategy game than an FPS. As an FPS it wouldn't really work unless it had a heavy story focus. I don't think the multiplayer would ever be as interesting as a modern or even WWII FPS game, which would turn off a lot of people so trying to win the single player crowd over instead would be very important. But even then it would take quite a bit of work to get it to be interesting enough for people to want to play it.

Plot: You are an British spy, who worked for an Secret agency in london, england. ( A little james bond )
Your mission is to infiltrate and gather information about the german army to look for a weakness ( The germans lost because of the lack of resources )
( Like the order ) you get special gadgets and weapons. to get to berlin you had to get from france to berlin on foot.
( A lot of things can happen between that destination to the other )  So the missions will work like espionage missions.
You had to help out on one or two of the trenches to get an exit route to germany, which includes an warfare, where british soldiers had to sacrifice themselves to help you reach the enemy trenches, where you kill germans in the trenches, all the way to the commander to assasinate him.
etc etc etc. Again, a lot of gaps to fill. and on your way to berlin, you find a factory where they manufactured tanks and such, infiltration and you have to get certain blueprints and sabotage the factory.  later you dress up like an german soldier, and you get to meet Hitler ( he was in the service back then as a corporal i think it was )  and you get all the way to germany where you infiltrate the military Admin buildings, and manage to find a weakness, where you have to escape from an entire army that are chasing you on a auto-mobile, until you can get to the danish boarder, over the sea to sweden to reveal to them the secrets, so they can send the message to the british army. you are contributing on cutting the incoming supplies the germans needs to continue fighting the war, by blowing up railroads etc etc.  There is a lot of things that can be done, it's just need a lot of research and historical events, and link the character to those events. Alternative story can be whatever that might work with the historical moments. 

A great WW2 game would be adventure/puzzle survival game, where you are an jewish prisoner in a consentration camp. That would be awesome, but that will neither never happen.



 

PSN: Opticstrike90
Steam: opticstrike90

@OP How is ww1 worse than ww2? you know the war were more people died, the war were people died because of racism instead just politics, the war were first nuclear bombs were used and on civiliians?



Baryonyx said:
baloofarsan said:
Do not mix reality with FPS war games. They have nothing to do with real wars and probably never will. FPS are fantasy products.


What?  FPS is an genre which ain't tied down exclusively to fantasy.

FPS is just the view.

as third person is an view.

Basically it's just the physical setting of the game, wether the story is fantasy or not, got nothing to do with first person view or third person view.

A game can be designed around reality just as much as fantasy as much as it want, despite what view mode it is.

and yes, a WW1 game can be a fictional story created on historical events while maintaining the historical settings and background. if that was what you referred to.  but still. FPS isn't exclusively forced to be all fantasy, since it's just the view mode.

First-person shooter (FPS): a video game genre centered on gun and projectile weapon-based combat through a first-person perspective.   http://no.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Førstepersonsskytespill

 

Fantasy (noun): the faculty or activity of imagining impossible or improbable things.   http://no.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fantasi

 



Around the Network

we dont see many ww1 games because its boring, the weapons got much to strong. a offense wasnt possible because the attacking army couldnt break the defense of the other army.
all i could see is a sniper game about the war in italy.



Remedy said:
WW2 is far more interesting in my opinion.

You're joking right? WW2 is overused.

@OP.

I like the idea, but not a lot of FPS fans will like it. World War 1 didn't have a lot of automatic weapons, which a lot of FPS fans like.



Bet with Xander XT: 

I can beat more games on his 3DS than he can on my PSVita in a month. Loser has to buy the winner a game on his/her handheld Guess who won? http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=193531

Me!

The_Sony_Girl1 said:
Remedy said:
WW2 is far more interesting in my opinion.

You're joking right? WW2 is overused.

@OP.

I like the idea, but not a lot of FPS fans will like it. World War 1 didn't have a lot of automatic weapons, which a lot of FPS fans like.

we hadnt a big shooter about ww2 in ages...



generic-user-1 said:
The_Sony_Girl1 said:
Remedy said:
WW2 is far more interesting in my opinion.

You're joking right? WW2 is overused.

@OP.

I like the idea, but not a lot of FPS fans will like it. World War 1 didn't have a lot of automatic weapons, which a lot of FPS fans like.

we hadnt a big shooter about ww2 in ages...

So? There's never been a big shooter about WW1.



Bet with Xander XT: 

I can beat more games on his 3DS than he can on my PSVita in a month. Loser has to buy the winner a game on his/her handheld Guess who won? http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=193531

Me!

The_Sony_Girl1 said:
generic-user-1 said:
The_Sony_Girl1 said:
Remedy said:
WW2 is far more interesting in my opinion.

You're joking right? WW2 is overused.

@OP.

I like the idea, but not a lot of FPS fans will like it. World War 1 didn't have a lot of automatic weapons, which a lot of FPS fans like.

we hadnt a big shooter about ww2 in ages...

So? There's never been a big shooter about WW1.

because they didnt used normal guns for the killing most of the time. there wasnt enough face to face pew pew to make a shooter.