By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - It's only fair if Metroid skips the Wii U

Samus Aran said:
Pavolink said:
Nobody wants Retro doing Metroid anymore. They lost any right to do when they abandoned it. I hope EAD takes again the challenge.

Lol, there are only 3 good EAD studios (the 3D Mario, Mario Kart and Zelda studio), the rest is mediocre.

And there's no chance in hell that any of those will make a Metroid. Everyone wants to see Retro do another Metroid game.


The MK team can do it, already finished their game. Also, they can give to a new studio. Retro better keep far from metroid doing their donkey games.



Proud to be the first cool Nintendo fan ever

Number ONE Zelda fan in the Universe

DKCTF didn't move consoles

Prediction: No Zelda HD for Wii U, quietly moved to the succesor

Predictions for Nintendo NX and Mobile


Around the Network
kitler53 said:

in some ways i think you have a point. in other ways i think you just want to agitate nintendo fans.

I will admit, I have definitely riled up the Nintendo fans on here on purpose a few times these last couple of months. I'll admit it (which probably does ruin my rep as being trustworthy)

with that said, I really am a big Nintendo fan still & this thread is serious. I really do think Metroid should sit this gen out if Nintendo can't give everyone time in the light. (History shows, they can't) 



*Sound Of Rain said:
kitler53 said:

in some ways i think you have a point. in other ways i think you just want to agitate nintendo fans.

I will admit, I have definitely riled up the Nintendo fans on here on purpose a few times these last couple of months. I'll admit it (which probably does ruin my rep as being trustworthy)

with that said, I really am a big Nintendo fan still & this thread is serious. I really do think Metroid should sit this gen out if Nintendo can't give everyone time in the light. (History shows, they can't) 

That's why they need to kill off F-Zero, Star Fox and Kirby. Sell them to Microsoft for all I care lol.



Recycle001 said:

This is just my opinion, but dropping Metroid would help to further cement Nintendo's image as a 'kiddie' company. Don't get me wrong, I love Nintendo IP's, but lets face it, there aren't any mature IP's that Nintendo really has. Devil's Third looks like a turd, pun intended. Now yes, Metroid isn't super mature and gritty, but it appeals to an older audience like myself. Other than Metroid and the new Devil's Third, all thats left in the mature department is Zelda, which Nintendo seems to flip-flop on. The upcoming Zelda game is mostly a mystery, all we really know is that its big, and there will be a lot to do. We have no idea if we're going to get another light-hearted romp through the land of Hyrule, or if a darker and more mature theme will be the focus. Based off graphics, I'm leaning towards the former.

Starfox they can totally drop. It's time has passed for sure. The orginal Starfox was, pretty much, a tech demo for the super fx chip. Sure the gameplay was fun and engaging and Nintendo built a neat world and populated it with lovable characters, but how relevant can a 3D space shooter be almost 20 years after its debut. I don't know many people who are into flight sims, not to say that there aren't people who are, but the games don't really make money or move hardware.

As far as new IP's showing growth, I'm kind of confused as to which you're talking about. Bayonetta is a 2nd party game, owned by Platinum. Same with Wonderful 101. Baten Kaitos and Xenoblade belong to Monolith. Smash belongs to HAL. Hyrule Warriors is a co-project with Koei Tecmo. So I mean what's left when it comes to new IP's? Captian Toad and Splatoon? One isn't out yet and neither are mature.  I'm not counting the 3DS here seeing as the topic is about the Wii U.

I also believe its time for Miyamoto to move on, Iwata as well along with most of the old guard. They did their job and had their time. They did amazing things in their time and built some of the most memorable gaming experiences that there ever will be. Hell an arugument could be made that Miyamoto single handedly saved the console gaming industry with Mario.  But it is time for them to move along and get some new blood to shake things up a bit.

New IP's are definitely needed, but giving up on too many of the old ones can really hurt your core audience, which generally comprise your early adoptors. They in turn help spread the news and show off their shiny new toy to their buddies and the cycle goes on. All I'm saying is that dropping Metroid would make a lot of people unhappy and really hurt the already lacking divirsity of titles on the Wii U.

I guess that's true, Metroid might appeal to a wider range of gamers

I like Star Fox 64 but the others weren't good. I think they should let him rest but technically, they did if they can change the game a lot and it sells well, they can keep it. Otherwise, I agree. Star Fox can die. He should've stayed gone but now that he's coming back, I'll give him a chance

I'm saying that they should make new IP's to replace the older mid-range series. I'm not talking about any announced already. I think Splatoon is a good start actually. Doesn't look mature in the sense you're talking about but it's still different for Nintendo.

Agree. Nintendo needs new ideas and fresh people in charge in order for things to change

That's why they keep games like Mario Kart, Smash Bros, Zelda, Animal Crossing and some others. These will get fans buying it. Then, release the new IP's along with them. If people see they're good, word wiill spread that way. Everything has to start somewhere 



Samus Aran said:

If there's anyone that needs a break it's Kirby.

I have always said this. Kirby gets way too many games. Let Hal do something else...

I didn't make the thread about him because Nintendo already announced a new Kirby



Around the Network

Hey! Kirby just had a 3 year break already! Plus Kirby > Metroid!



Samus Aran said:

That's why they need to kill off F-Zero, Star Fox and Kirby. Sell them to Microsoft for all I care lol.

I would trade any of them for Banjo back



Einsam_Delphin said:
Hey! Kirby just had a 3 year break already! Plus Kirby > Metroid!

You're lucky we are only talking about consoles. Kirby just had a 3DS release less than a year ago

Even so, 3 years is nothing... We waited a decade for Pikmin & Star Fox. F-Zero is still waiting...

I actually agree, I should change the topic to Kirby needs a break...



*Sound Of Rain said:
Einsam_Delphin said:
Hey! Kirby just had a 3 year break already! Plus Kirby > Metroid!

You're lucky we are only talking about consoles. Kirby just had a 3DS release less than a year ago

Even so, 3 years is nothing... We waited a decade for Pikmin & Star Fox. F-Zero is still waiting...

I actually agree, I should change the topic to Kirby needs a break...


Prior to Triple Deluxe his last game was in 2011.

HAL rarely ever makes anything other than Kirby so that wouldn't really change anything.



Einsam_Delphin said:
*Sound Of Rain said:
Einsam_Delphin said:
Hey! Kirby just had a 3 year break already! Plus Kirby > Metroid!

You're lucky we are only talking about consoles. Kirby just had a 3DS release less than a year ago

Even so, 3 years is nothing... We waited a decade for Pikmin & Star Fox. F-Zero is still waiting...

I actually agree, I should change the topic to Kirby needs a break...


Prior to Triple Deluxe his last game was in 2011.

HAL rarely ever makes anything other than Kirby so that wouldn't really change anything.

God forbid they made something decent for a change.

That's like saying the AC studio should only makes AC so they should stick to that. Yet they finally made something new: Splatoon (I'm sure they're also working on a new AC for Wii U). And a lot more people are hyped for Splatoon than Kirby and the Rainbow Curse.