Its not hilarious because I proved that there are mid-gen PS games with better character models than XCX. Try proving otherwise.

It has blurry textures and looks like it has far fewer polygons compared to the above games. And the ones which I showed you isn't even the best character models made by Santa Monica Studio and Naughty Dog.

The character models in the Xenosaga games were fine. They atleast adhered to the basics of facial anatomy.

The world looks beautiful but 60fps isnt a megaton. The character models look pretty weird to boot, but I play games like this for the story to tell you the truth.

The difference here is that you just went out of your way to look for horrible screenshots for the games I posted (aside from Beyond which I can't believe you're trying to pass off as worse than XCX) to proof your point, while comparing them to screenshots that Nintendo uses to market the game with, I hope you realize where the problem with that method lies.

100% agree. I noticed screen tearing too, framerate is not stable, very noticeable with far camera orbitting. Just like Shining Resonance, it's probably self suggestion. It did happen to me, i saw Shining Resonance footage on youtube, it has 60fps version, so i thought it was 60fps.. lol

If someone say it's 60fps he must be blinded by his fanboism.. 720P 30FPS MAX. "Wow supposedly weak Wii U has the best graphics out of three, it must be M$ and $ony conspiracy" ah, that classic Wii U fans justification. LMAO

I used a picture that shows ingame graphics for tlou. there's no point in using bullshots or cutscenes that look better than ingame.

The pictures I gave you were neither bullshots nor cutscenes. And in any case utscenese use the same character model as gameplay in most games these days.

On nintendo, what you see is what you get. The other pictures show the real graphics of ps360 titles, if you find them horrible then it proves my point.

Check the last page for the proving otherwise part.