i've meant the maturity of the system itself, not the games. so basically the OS and the hardware. the way the device looks and feels, the OS, the screen and so on.

2? wow!! I know it has "no support", but i never knew it was litteraly no support!! 22 games for PS4 is awesome though. 2015's sales will be so much better. Also crazy how Vita has more games than even the 3DS!! Someone will of course talk about quality and quantity now

Of course it's Nintendo's fault, just as it was Sony's fault for thinking the Vita would have third party support from the very beginning.  As Yoshida said, "In retrospect, there are so many options for publishers now that we cannot take it for granted that our new platform would be supported by third parties."  He also said they were going to try a lot harder to secure third party support for the Vita and it seems he was true to his word.  The only ones responsible for a console are the ones who make that console.

Vita means life!

Narrow minded view that ignores all external factors. It's Sony's fault that Vita has no first party support.

Its Nintendo's job to sell 3rd parties on their console. Being underpowered, harder to port to and having rubbish sales isnt going to sell anyone on developing for WiiU.

Well the number of games is not an issue for the vita. It is just that Yokai Watch/pokemon/monster hunter are so strong sales wise that any of those probably will sell more than 30 vita games together.

No, that's the job of third parties.

GC didn't have much third party support either.

Nintendo fans don't buy much third party games, that's not Nintendo's fault.

But vita has no games ?

Ironically, this is a result of Nintendo doing what everyone said Nintendo should be doing. If they had just gone the way they did with Wii, I doubt we'd be discussing about the lack of game releases.