By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - Common Fallacies

I was moving some books around when I came accros my Argument and Persuasions class book anyways I thought you all might like some of this. or maybe need to know some of this.



"Back off, man. I'm a scientist."

Your theories are the worst kind of popular tripe, your methods are sloppy, and your conclusions are highly questionable! You are a poor scientist. Especially if you think the moon landing was faked.


ioi + 1
Around the Network

From - Seventh edition, Elements of Argument,
by Annette T. Rottenberg

Common fallacies

1. Hasty Generalization

Drawing conclusions on the basis of insufficient evidence. Many of our prejudices are a result of hasty generalization. A prejudice is literally a judgment made before all the facts are in.

2. Faulty Use of Authority

The attempt to bolster claims by citing the opinions of experts.

3. Post Hoc or Doubtful Cause

Latin - post hoc, ergo propter hoc, meaning “after this, therefore because of this”. The arguer infers that because one event follows another event, the first event must be the cause of the second.

4. False Analogy

Many analogies are merely descriptive and offer no proof of the connection between the two things being compared.

5. Ad Hominem

The Latin term ad hominem means “against the man” and refers to an attack on the person rather than on the argument or the issue.

6. False Dilemma

As the name tells us, the false dilemma, sometimes called the black-white fallacy, poses an either-or situation. The arguer suggest that only two alternatives exist, although there may be other explanations of or solutions to the problem under discussion.

7. Slippery Slope

If an arguer predicts that taking a first step will lead inevitably to a second, usually undesirable step, he or she must provide evidence that this will happen. Otherwise, the arguer is guilty of a slippery slope fallacy.

8. Begging the Question

If the writer makes a statement that assumes that the very question being argued has already been proved, the writer is guilty of begging the question.

9. Straw Man
The straw-man fallacy consists of an attack on a view similar to but not the same as the one your opponent holds. It is a familiar diversionary tactic.

10. Two wrongs make a Right

The two-wrongs-make-a-right fallacy is another example of the way in which attention may be diverted from the question at issue.

11. Non Sequitur

The Latin term non sequitur, which means “it does not follow,” is another fallacy of irrelevance. In a non sequitur, the conclusion can be either true or false, but the argument is a fallacy because the conclusion does not follow from the premise.
Kenzo summery from book - Ex. Rich people are more suited for president.

12. Ad Populum

Arguers guilty of the ad populum fallacy make an appeal to prejudices of the people. They assume that their claim can be adequately defended without further support if they emphasize a belief or attitude that the audience shares with them.

13. Appeal to Tradition

In making an appeal to tradition, the arguer assumes that what has existed for along time and has therefore become a tradition should continue to exist because it is a tradition.

14. Faulty Emotional Appeals

In some discussions of fallacies, appeals to the emotions of the audience are treated as illegitimate or “counterfeit proofs” All such appeals however, are not illegitimate.



"Back off, man. I'm a scientist."

Your theories are the worst kind of popular tripe, your methods are sloppy, and your conclusions are highly questionable! You are a poor scientist. Especially if you think the moon landing was faked.


ioi + 1

What are you trying to say?




Nintendo still doomed?
Feel free to add me on 3DS or Switch! (PM me if you do ^-^)
Nintendo ID: Mako91                  3DS code: 4167-4543-6089

HOw does this have anything to do with how Awesome SMG is n how T3H CELL will one day PWN all



All hail the KING, Andrespetmonkey

We fail at argument! jk

I thought with all the deabtes here and the elections it might intrest people here, refresh them and or educate.



"Back off, man. I'm a scientist."

Your theories are the worst kind of popular tripe, your methods are sloppy, and your conclusions are highly questionable! You are a poor scientist. Especially if you think the moon landing was faked.


ioi + 1
Around the Network

very interesting. Copied to a document for later use.



You can find me on facebook as Markus Van Rijn, if you friend me just mention you're from VGchartz and who you are here.

Hehe, interesting. Sounds eerily familiar.



hsrob said:
Hehe, interesting. Sounds eerily familiar.

You probably had a class about this.

 

Now go to the global warming thread and highlight all the fallacies! jk



"Back off, man. I'm a scientist."

Your theories are the worst kind of popular tripe, your methods are sloppy, and your conclusions are highly questionable! You are a poor scientist. Especially if you think the moon landing was faked.


ioi + 1

I've been citing them for a long time, but everyone ignores them. Good luck trying, though.



Interesting. Sign post.



 “In the entertainment business, there are only heaven and hell, and nothing in between and as soon as our customers bore of our products, we will crash.”  Hiroshi Yamauchi

TAG:  Like a Yamauchi pimp slap delivered by Il Maelstrom; serving it up with style.